Havens v. Brooks
| Christopher Dale Havens |
| Chief Michael Brooks, Judge Diana McGinnis, Sheriff Bill Mills, Deputy Chief Amando Chapa, Sergeant Maddox, Sergeant Thomas Arisola and FNU Appel, Guard |
| 25-40290 |
| May 21, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to comply with the Court's notice of 08/11/2025 [25-40290] (MVM) [Entered: 10/15/2025 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 14 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Miscellaneous deadline updated to 09/30/2025 for Appellant Christopher Dale Havens [25-40290] (MVM) [Entered: 09/30/2025 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 12 UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. [25-40290] (MVM) [Entered: 08/11/2025 12:49 PM] |
| Filing 10 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. [25-40290] (MVM) [Entered: 07/28/2025 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 8 UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. [25-40290] (SH) [Entered: 06/16/2025 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Signed NOA due on 06/27/2025 for Appellant Christopher Dale Havens [25-40290] (SH) [Entered: 05/28/2025 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Christopher Dale Havens [25-40290] (SH) [Entered: 05/21/2025 02:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
