Luxottica v. Brave Optical
| Luxottica of America, Incorporated |
| Brave Optical, Incorporated, Jeffrey Gray and Dawn Gray |
| 25-40309 |
| May 30, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Trademark |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 36 BRIEFING COMPLETE.Reply Brief deadline canceled [25-40309] (RAJ) [Entered: 11/13/2025 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 35 APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 E/Res's Brief deadline satisfied. Reply Brief due on 11/04/2025 for Appellants Brave Optical, Incorporated, Dawn Gray and Jeffrey Gray [25-40309] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED by Luxottica of America, Incorporated. Date of service: 10/14/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Coale, Cox, Sode, Stanton; Attorney for Appellants: Johnston, Thornton, Will [25-40309] (David Steven Coale ) [Entered: 10/14/2025 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 33 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Peter Sode for party(s) Appellee Luxottica of America, Incorporated, in case 25-40309 [25-40309] (RAJ) [Entered: 09/08/2025 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 32 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [25-40309] (Peter Sode ) [Entered: 09/05/2025 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 31 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellee Luxottica of America, Incorporated. Extension Granted to and including 10/17/2025. E/Res's Brief deadline updated to 10/17/2025 for Appellee Luxottica of America, Incorporated [25-40309] (RAJ) [Entered: 09/05/2025 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 30 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellee Luxottica of America, Incorporated for filing Brief of Appellee until 10/17/2025 [25-40309] (David Steven Coale ) [Entered: 09/05/2025 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 29 RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. # of Copies Provided: 0 Record Excerpts deadline satisfied [25-40309] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellants Brave Optical, Incorporated, Ms. Dawn Gray and Mr. Jeffrey Gray. Date of service: 08/28/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Coale, Cox, Stanton; Attorney for Appellants: Johnston, Thornton, Will [25-40309] (Robert Merle Thornton ) [Entered: 08/28/2025 01:31 PM] |
| Filing 28 PROPOSED SUFFICIENT BRIEF filed by Appellants Brave Optical, Incorporated, Ms. Dawn Gray and Mr. Jeffrey Gray [ # 26 ] Date of service: 08/28/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Coale, Cox, Stanton; Attorney for Appellants: Johnston, Thornton, Will [25-40309] (Robert Merle Thornton ) [Entered: 08/28/2025 12:36 PM] |
| Filing 26 SUFFICIENT APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 Sufficient Brief deadline satisfied [25-40309] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANTS' BRIEF FILED. Brief NOT Sufficient: The caption on the brief does not match the court's official caption; missing the standard of review (or it is not labeled) and the brief is missing record citations. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 0. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Record Excerpts due on 09/02/2025 for Appellants Brave Optical, Incorporated, Dawn Gray and Jeffrey Gray. Sufficient Brief due on 09/02/2025 for Appellants Brave Optical, Incorporated, Dawn Gray and Jeffrey Gray. Appellee's Brief due on 09/17/2025 for Appellee Luxottica of America, Incorporated. [25-40309] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Brave Optical, Incorporated, Ms. Dawn Gray and Mr. Jeffrey Gray. Date of service: 08/18/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Coale, Cox, Stanton; Attorney for Appellants: Johnston, Thornton, Will [25-40309] (Robert Merle Thornton ) [Entered: 08/18/2025 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 25 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 08/18/2025 for Appellants Brave Optical, Incorporated, Dawn Gray and Jeffrey Gray. [25-40309] (DDL) [Entered: 07/07/2025 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 24 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-40309] (DDL) [Entered: 07/07/2025 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 22 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jessica Cox for party(s) Appellee Luxottica of America, Incorporated, in case 25-40309 [25-40309] (SR) [Entered: 06/17/2025 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 21 STATEMENT OF ISSUES FILED. [25-40309] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: STATEMENT OF ISSUES FILED by Appellants Brave Optical, Incorporated, Ms. Dawn Gray and Mr. Jeffrey Gray. Date of Service: 06/17/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Coale, Stanton; Attorney for Appellants: Johnston, Thornton, Will [25-40309] (Robert Merle Thornton ) [Entered: 06/17/2025 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 20 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [25-40309] (Jessica Cox ) [Entered: 06/17/2025 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 19 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:22-CV-244. Electronic ROA due on 06/27/2025. [25-40309] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/12/2025 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 18 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Brave Optical, Incorporated, Ms. Dawn Gray and Mr. Jeffrey Gray advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [25-40309] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Brave Optical, Incorporated, Ms. Dawn Gray and Mr. Jeffrey Gray advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 06/12/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Coale, Stanton; Attorney for Appellants: Johnston, Thornton, Will [25-40309] (Robert Merle Thornton ) [Entered: 06/12/2025 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Britta Erin Stanton for Appellee Luxottica of America, Incorporated in 25-40309 [25-40309] (SR) [Entered: 06/09/2025 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Clark Bradford Will for party(s) Appellant Jeffrey Gray Appellant Brave Optical, Incorporated Appellant Dawn Gray, in case 25-40309 [25-40309] (SR) [Entered: 06/09/2025 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Britta Erin Stanton for Luxottica of America, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [25-40309] (Britta Erin Stanton ) [Entered: 06/06/2025 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-40309] (Clark Bradford Will ) [Entered: 06/06/2025 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Robert Merle Thornton for party(s) Appellant Jeffrey Gray Appellant Brave Optical, Incorporated Appellant Dawn Gray, in case 25-40309 [25-40309] (STH) [Entered: 06/06/2025 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-40309] (Robert Merle Thornton ) [Entered: 06/06/2025 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) David Steven Coale for party(s) Appellee Luxottica of America, Incorporated, in case 25-40309 [25-40309] (SR) [Entered: 06/05/2025 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-40309] (David Steven Coale ) [Entered: 06/04/2025 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 06/20/2025 for Appellants Brave Optical, Incorporated, Dawn Gray and Jeffrey Gray [25-40309] (RA) [Entered: 06/04/2025 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Brave Optical, Incorporated, Ms. Dawn Gray and Mr. Jeffrey Gray [25-40309] (RA) [Entered: 05/30/2025 08:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
