Grizzle v. Bell
| Robert Grizzle |
| Christopher Bell, Kurtis Tillis, Mark Roberts and Andrea Walker |
| 25-40392 |
| June 27, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 12/02/2025 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Robert Grizzle. Fee due on 01/12/2026 for Appellant Robert Grizzle [25-40392] (AMD) [Entered: 12/10/2025 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Michael J. Calb for Appellee Andrea Walker in 25-40392, Attorney Michael J. Calb for Appellee Mark Roberts in 25-40392, Attorney Michael J. Calb for Appellee Kurtis Tillis in 25-40392, Attorney Michael J. Calb for Appellee Christopher Bell in 25-40392 [25-40392] (AMD) [Entered: 08/27/2025 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-40392] (Michael J. Calb ) [Entered: 08/27/2025 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 7 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Robert Grizzle. Fee deadline satisfied. [25-40392] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/01/2025 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 6 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: Notice to the court that he applied to the district court for IFP [25-40392] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/01/2025 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 09/02/2025 for Appellant Robert Grizzle [25-40392] (SH) [Entered: 07/09/2025 08:45 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Robert Grizzle [25-40392] (SH) [Entered: 06/27/2025 03:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
