Hunter v. Smith
| James Anthony Hunter |
| Larry Smith, Sheriff, FNU Shoemaker, Lieutenant, FNU Martin, Captain, FNU McCarver, Lieutenant, FNU Kettler, Lieutenant, FNU Stroud, Detention Officer and Turn Key Health |
| 25-40613 |
| September 29, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [8] [25-40613] (CMC) [Entered: 02/04/2026 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 7 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 01/22/2026 for Appellant James Anthony Hunter [25-40613] (CMC) [Entered: 01/13/2026 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 6 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 09/25/2025 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. James Anthony Hunter because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case. Fee deadline satisfied. Fee or motion for IFP in 5CCA due on 01/07/2026 for Appellant James Anthony Hunter [25-40613] (CMC) [Entered: 12/08/2025 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 12/01/2025 for Appellant James Anthony Hunter [25-40613] (JAK) [Entered: 10/06/2025 08:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. James Anthony Hunter [25-40613] (JAK) [Entered: 09/29/2025 02:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
