Garcia-Perez v. Garza
| Abel Garcia-Perez |
| Mary Garza, Jessica Cabrera, Ruby Serna, Crystal Martinez, Crystal Garcia and Audrey O'Neill, Commissioner of Family and Protective Services |
| 25-40673 |
| October 20, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 01/08/2026 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Abel Garcia-Perez because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case.Fee due on 05/15/2026 for Appellant Abel Garcia-Perez [25-40673] (CMC) [Entered: 04/15/2026 12:07 PM] |
| Filing 10 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 01/08/2026 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Abel Garcia-Perez because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessment required - BAUGH case. [25-40673] (CMC) [Entered: 01/16/2026 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 7 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Abel Garcia-Perez. Fee deadline satisfied. [25-40673] (CMC) [Entered: 11/20/2025 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 6 LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Abel Garcia-Perez advising the court that a motion to proceed in forma pauperis has been filed in the district court. [25-40673] (CMC) [Entered: 11/20/2025 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 12/22/2025 for Appellant Abel Garcia-Perez [25-40673] (IAC) [Entered: 10/28/2025 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Abel Garcia-Perez [25-40673] (IAC) [Entered: 10/20/2025 09:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
