Ferrara v. Swonke
| John David Ferrara, also known as John D. Ferrara |
| Joseph Swonke, City of Kyle, Kyle Police Department; his individual capacity only, Pedro Carrasco, CIty of Kyle, Kyle Police Department; his individual capacity only and Unknown Kyle Police Officers |
| 25-50272 |
| April 8, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 35
MANDATE ISSUED. Mandate issue date satisfied. [25-50272] (RSM) [Entered: 09/02/2025 09:39 AM]
|
Filing 34
COURT ORDER denying Petition for rehearing filed by Appellant Mr. John David Ferrara [ # 31 ] Mandate issue date is 09/02/2025 [25-50272] (CAS) [Entered: 08/25/2025 03:55 PM]
|
Filing 31
PETITION filed by Appellant Mr. John David Ferrara for rehearing [31] Number of Copies: 0. Mandate issue date canceled.. [25-50272] (RSM) [Entered: 08/12/2025 11:12 AM]
|
Filing 29
JUDGMENT ENTERED AND FILED. Costs Taxed Against: Appellant. [25-50272] (CAS) [Entered: 08/07/2025 05:21 PM]
|
Filing 28
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [25-50272 Affirmed ] Judge: WED , Judge: CTW , Judge: DMD Mandate issue date is 08/28/2025 [25-50272] (CAS) [Entered: 08/07/2025 05:17 PM]
|
Filing 16
APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED by Mr. John David Ferrara. # of Copies Provided: 0 Reply Brief deadline satisfied [25-50272] (RLJ) [Entered: 07/11/2025 08:47 AM]
|
Filing 15
APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 E/Res's Brief deadline satisfied. Reply Brief due on 07/09/2025 for Appellant John David Ferrara [25-50272] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Pedro Carrasco and Mr. Joseph Swonke. Date of service: 06/18/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Barron, Leake, Pierce; Appellant Ferrara; US mail - Appellant Ferrara [25-50272] (Stephen Blackmon Barron ) [Entered: 06/18/2025 11:36 PM]
|
Filing 14
APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. John David Ferrara. # of Copies Provided: 0 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Appellee's Brief due on 06/18/2025 for Appellees Pedro Carrasco and Joseph Swonke [25-50272] (RSM) [Entered: 05/23/2025 10:59 AM]
|
Filing 13
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/17/2025 for Appellant John David Ferrara. [25-50272] (DDL) [Entered: 05/08/2025 03:25 PM]
|
Filing 12
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-50272] (DDL) [Entered: 05/08/2025 03:25 PM]
|
Filing 10
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Blair J. Leake as co-counsel for party(s) Appellee Joseph Swonke Appellee Pedro Carrasco, in case 25-50272 [25-50272] (RLJ) [Entered: 05/02/2025 08:46 AM]
|
Filing 9
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Stephen Blackmon Barron for party(s) Appellee Joseph Swonke Appellee Pedro Carrasco, in case 25-50272 [25-50272] (RLJ) [Entered: 05/02/2025 08:42 AM]
|
Filing 8
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [25-50272] (Blair J. Leake ) [Entered: 04/29/2025 01:11 PM]
|
Filing 7
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-50272] (Stephen Blackmon Barron ) [Entered: 04/29/2025 01:09 PM]
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:24-CV-77. Electronic ROA due on 04/30/2025. [25-50272] (RSM) [Entered: 04/15/2025 09:27 AM]
|
Filing 5
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [25-50272] (RSM) [Entered: 04/15/2025 09:24 AM]
|
Filing 1
CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. John David Ferrara [25-50272] (LEF) [Entered: 04/08/2025 10:13 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.