Chandan v. Life Time
Plaintiff: Sanjiv Chandan, also known as Tony Chandan
Defendant: Life Time Fitness, Incorporated
Case Number: 25-50673
Filed: August 19, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2025 Filing 15 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:24-CV-197. Electronic ROA due on 10/16/2025. [25-50673] (PAC) [Entered: 10/01/2025 12:13 PM]
October 1, 2025 Filing 14 TRANSCRIPT FILED IN DISTRICT COURT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Gigi Simcox, Dt. Filed in Dist. Ct: 10/01/2025 Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date canceled [25-50673] (PAC) [Entered: 10/01/2025 12:13 PM]
October 1, 2025 Filing 13 NOTICE RECEIVED that the transcript ordered by Appellant Mr. Sanjiv Chandan is complete and has been filed in the District Court. [25-50673] (Gigi Simcox ) [Entered: 10/01/2025 08:13 AM]
September 23, 2025 Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Gigi Simcox, Est. Completion Dt: 10/05/2025, Est. No.of Pgs: 7, Dt. Fin Arrangements Made: 09/22/2025, Dt. Trans. to be Filed: 10/22/2025, Proceeding Type and Date: Status Conference 07/10/2025. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment ddl satisfied. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 10/22/2025 for Gigi Simcox [25-50673] (ABT) [Entered: 09/23/2025 12:27 PM]
September 23, 2025 Filing 11 COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Court Reporter Ms. Gigi Simcox. [25-50673] (Gigi Simcox ) [Entered: 09/23/2025 09:27 AM]
September 19, 2025 Filing 10 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Sanjiv Chandan. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Gigi Simcox, Proceeding Type and Date: Status Conference 07/10/2025. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 09/29/2025 for Gigi Simcox. [25-50673] (ABT) [Entered: 09/19/2025 02:42 PM]
September 8, 2025 Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Scott Novak for party(s) Appellee Life Time Fitness, Incorporated, in case 25-50673 [25-50673] (SR) [Entered: 09/08/2025 03:53 PM]
September 3, 2025 Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-50673] (Scott Novak ) [Entered: 09/03/2025 04:49 PM]
August 26, 2025 Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 09/10/2025 for Appellant Sanjiv Chandan. Transcript order due on 09/10/2025 for Appellant Sanjiv Chandan [25-50673] (EMF) [Entered: 08/26/2025 09:31 AM]
August 19, 2025 Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Sanjiv Chandan [25-50673] (MBC) [Entered: 08/19/2025 11:04 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Chandan v. Life Time
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sanjiv Chandan, also known as Tony Chandan
Represented By: Kenneth Ernest Grubbs Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Life Time Fitness, Incorporated
Represented By: T. Danielle Ross
Represented By: Scott Novak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?