Garces v. Saenz
Plaintiff: Matthew Andrew Garces
Defendant: Rolando Saenz, Doctor, Clinician at San Lucas Surgical Associates, Yvonne, Insurance verifier acting as agent of San Lucas, San Lucas Surgical Associates, Place of public accommodation under ADA and John Doe Security Guards, Agents of San Lucas
Case Number: 25-50867
Filed: October 23, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Torts
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2026 Filing 10 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to file appellant's brief [10] [25-50867] (MBC) [Entered: 02/11/2026 12:52 PM]
January 12, 2026 Filing 9 DISMISSAL NOTICE ISSUED for failure to file appellant's brief [9] A/Pet's Brief deadline canceled. DIS-1 Remedy due on 01/27/2026 for Appellant Matthew Andrew Garces. [25-50867] (RLJ) [Entered: 01/12/2026 11:34 AM]
November 25, 2025 Filing 8 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 01/05/2026 for Appellant Matthew Andrew Garces. [25-50867] (DDL) [Entered: 11/25/2025 01:31 PM]
November 25, 2025 Filing 7 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-50867] (DDL) [Entered: 11/25/2025 01:31 PM]
November 3, 2025 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:25-CV-605. Electronic ROA due on 11/18/2025. [25-50867] (IAC) [Entered: 11/03/2025 11:58 AM]
November 3, 2025 Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [25-50867] (IAC) [Entered: 11/03/2025 11:55 AM]
October 23, 2025 Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Matthew Andrew Garces [25-50867] (IAC) [Entered: 10/23/2025 10:12 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Garces v. Saenz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew Andrew Garces
Represented By: Matthew Andrew Garces
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rolando Saenz, Doctor, Clinician at San Lucas Surgical Associates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yvonne, Insurance verifier acting as agent of San Lucas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: San Lucas Surgical Associates, Place of public accommodation under ADA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe Security Guards, Agents of San Lucas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?