Chavez Law v. Depositors Insurance
| Chavez Law, P.C., doing business as Chavez Law Firm |
| Depositors Insurance Company, doing business as Nationwide |
| 25-50900 |
| November 3, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Insurance |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 33 APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 Reply Brief deadline satisfied [25-50900] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED by Chavez Law, P.C.. Date of service: 03/23/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Chavez, Kuhn; Attorney for Appellees: DiLizia, Fitzgerald, Kemp, Wall [25-50900] (Kurt Howard Kuhn ) [Entered: 03/23/2026 01:14 PM] |
| Filing 32 APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 E/Res's Brief deadline satisfied. Reply Brief due on 03/24/2026 for Appellant Chavez Law, P.C. [25-50900] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED by Depositors Insurance Company. Date of service: 03/03/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Chavez, Kuhn; Attorney for Appellees: DiLizia, Fitzgerald, Kemp, Wall [25-50900] (Patrick M. Kemp ) [Entered: 03/03/2026 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 30 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Daniel DiLizia for party(s) Appellee Depositors Insurance Company, in case 25-50900 [25-50900] (RSM) [Entered: 02/16/2026 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 29 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [25-50900] (Daniel DiLizia ) [Entered: 02/11/2026 08:53 AM] |
| Filing 28 RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. # of Paper Copies Provided: 0 [25-50900] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Chavez Law, P.C.. Date of service: 02/02/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Chavez, Kuhn; Attorney for Appellees: Fitzgerald, Kemp, Wall [25-50900] (Kurt Howard Kuhn ) [Entered: 02/02/2026 05:29 PM] |
| Filing 27 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED # of Paper Copies Provided: 0 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Appellee's Brief due on 03/04/2026 for Appellee Depositors Insurance Company [25-50900] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Chavez Law, P.C.. Date of service: 02/02/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Chavez, Kuhn; Attorney for Appellees: Fitzgerald, Kemp, Wall [25-50900] (Kurt Howard Kuhn ) [Entered: 02/02/2026 05:27 PM] |
| Filing 25 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kurt Howard Kuhn for party(s) Appellant Chavez Law, P.C., in case 25-50900 [25-50900] (RSM) [Entered: 01/26/2026 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 24 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-50900] (Kurt Howard Kuhn ) [Entered: 01/23/2026 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 23 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Chavez Law, P.C.. Extension Granted to and including 02/04/2026. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 02/04/2026 for Appellant Chavez Law, P.C. [25-50900] (EMF) [Entered: 12/17/2025 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 22 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Chavez Law, P.C. for filing Appellant's Brief until 02/04/2026 [25-50900] (Enrique Chavez Jr.) [Entered: 12/17/2025 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 20 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Robert Glen Wall for Appellee Depositors Insurance Company in 25-50900 [25-50900] (RSM) [Entered: 12/02/2025 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 18 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Leah Bethany Fitzgerald for party(s) Appellee Depositors Insurance Company, in case 25-50900 [25-50900] (RSM) [Entered: 12/02/2025 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 17 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [25-50900] (Leah Bethany Fitzgerald ) [Entered: 11/26/2025 09:04 AM] |
| Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Robert Glen Wall for Depositors Insurance Company for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [25-50900] (Robert Glen Wall ) [Entered: 11/26/2025 07:44 AM] |
| Filing 15 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Chavez Law, P.C. advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [25-50900] (EMF) [Entered: 11/25/2025 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 14 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 01/05/2026 for Appellant Chavez Law, P.C.. [25-50900] (DDL) [Entered: 11/25/2025 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 13 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-50900] (DDL) [Entered: 11/25/2025 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 12 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Chavez Law, P.C. advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [25-50900] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Chavez Law, P.C. advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 11/25/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Chavez; Attorney for Appellees: Kemp, Wall [25-50900] (Enrique Chavez Jr.) [Entered: 11/25/2025 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Patrick M. Kemp for party(s) Appellee Depositors Insurance Company, in case 25-50900 [25-50900] (IAC) [Entered: 11/18/2025 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-50900] (Patrick M. Kemp ) [Entered: 11/14/2025 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:24-CV-158. Electronic ROA due on 12/01/2025. [25-50900] (RSM) [Entered: 11/14/2025 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [25-50900] (RSM) [Entered: 11/14/2025 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Chavez Law, P.C. [25-50900] (RSM) [Entered: 11/03/2025 08:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
