Lewis-Watson v. Driscoll
| Lisa Lewis-Watson |
| Daniel P. Driscoll, Secretary of the Army, Pamela Bondi, U.S. Attorney General, John F. Bash, United States Attorney and D. John Sauer, Solictor General, U.S. Department of Justice |
| 25-50939 |
| November 13, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 filed by Appellant Ms. Lisa Lewis-Watson [ # 9 ] [25-50939] (PAC) [Entered: 01/16/2026 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Robert D. Green for party(s) Appellee Daniel P. Driscoll Appellee Pamela Bondi, U.S. Attorney General Appellee D. John Sauer, Solictor General, U.S. Department of Justice Appellee John F. Bash, in case 25-50939 [25-50939] (JAK) [Entered: 12/17/2025 08:47 AM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Robert D. Green for Mr. John F. Bash, Ms. Pamela Bondi, U.S. Attorney General, Mr. Daniel P. Driscoll and Mr. D. John Sauer, Solictor General, U.S. Department of Justice for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-50939] (Robert D. Green ) [Entered: 12/16/2025 06:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee due on 12/17/2025 for Appellant Lisa Lewis-Watson [25-50939] (NMF) [Entered: 12/02/2025 12:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 US CIVIL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Lisa Lewis-Watson [25-50939] (NMF) [Entered: 11/13/2025 11:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
