USA v. Lopez
| United States of America |
| Gilberto Lopez |
| 25-51036 |
| December 17, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Vacate Sentence (2255) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Gilberto Lopez in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 20 ] (INCORPORATED IN MOTION FOR COA) Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [21] [25-51036] (MBC) [Entered: 04/15/2026 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 20 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Gilberto Lopez for certificate of appealability [20]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [25-51036] (MBC) [Entered: 04/15/2026 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 19 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to comply with COA requirements filed by Appellant Mr. Gilberto Lopez [ # 13 ] Motion due deadline updated to 04/15/2026 for Appellant Gilberto Lopez. Brief in Support deadline updated to 04/15/2026 for Appellant Gilberto Lopez [25-51036] (MBC) [Entered: 03/05/2026 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 17 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Gilberto Lopez Transfer to a place where appellant can work on legal matters [17]. [25-51036] (incororpated in extension motion to comply with COA) (MBC) [Entered: 03/05/2026 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Gilberto Lopez to extend time to comply with Certificate of Appealability requirements [13]. [25-51036] (MBC) [Entered: 03/03/2026 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 12 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-51036] (DDL) [Entered: 02/12/2026 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:24-CV-353. Electronic ROA due on 02/19/2026. [25-51036] (MBC) [Entered: 02/04/2026 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 10 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 03/16/2026 for Appellant Gilberto Lopez. Brief in Support due on 03/16/2026 for Appellant Gilberto Lopez [25-51036] (MBC) [Entered: 02/04/2026 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 9 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 02/03/2026 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. Gilberto Lopez. [25-51036] (MBC) [Entered: 02/04/2026 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 7 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Gilberto Lopez. Fee deadline satisfied [25-51036] (MBC) [Entered: 02/04/2026 09:31 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee due on 01/30/2026 for Appellant Gilberto Lopez [25-51036] (NMF) [Entered: 01/15/2026 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Gilberto Lopez [25-51036] (NMF) [Entered: 12/17/2025 11:01 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Lopez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Zachary Carl Richter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gilberto Lopez | |
| Represented By: | Gilberto Lopez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
