ARC Spclt Prod v. EPA
Petitioner: ARC Specialty Products and Balchem Corporation, doing business as ARC Specialty Products
Respondent: United States Environmental Protection Agency
Case Number: 25-60146
Filed: March 25, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2025 Filing 30 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Respondent EPA [ # 29 ] [25-60146] (RA) [Entered: 07/30/2025 08:59 AM]
July 29, 2025 Filing 29 MOTION filed by Respondent EPA to withdraw as counsel [29]. Date of service: 07/29/2025 via US mail - Attorney for Respondent: Chaudhary; email - Attorney for Respondents: Dupre, Glickman; Attorney for Petitioner: Killian [25-60146] (Phillip R. Dupre ) [Entered: 07/29/2025 10:22 AM]
July 28, 2025 Filing 27 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Laura J. Glickman for party(s) Respondent EPA, in case 25-60146 [25-60146] (RA) [Entered: 07/28/2025 03:45 PM]
July 28, 2025 Filing 26 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-60146] (Laura J. Glickman ) [Entered: 07/28/2025 02:26 PM]
July 28, 2025 Filing 25 COURT ORDER granting joint motion to stay further proceedings in this court for 90 days, or until October 20, 2025, filed by Respondent EPA and Petitioners ARC Specialty Products and Balchem Corporation [ # 17 ]. [25-60146] (DLJ) [Entered: 07/28/2025 12:26 PM]
July 17, 2025 Filing 17 JOINT MOTION filed by Respondent EPA and Petitioners ARC Specialty Products and Balchem Corporation to stay further proceedings in this court to determine whether a resolution to this matter can be finalized. [25-60146] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Respondent EPA to stay further proceedings in this court. Reason: EPA and ARC have had productive communications regarding a potential resolution to this matter. The Parties believe it is in their interest to hold this matter in abeyance while they determine whether a resolution to this matter can be finalized.. Date of service: 07/17/2025 via US mail - Attorney for Respondent: Chaudhary; email - Attorney for Respondent: Dupre; Attorney for Petitioner: Killian [25-60146] (Phillip R. Dupre ) [Entered: 07/17/2025 03:47 PM]
May 29, 2025 Filing 16 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to file Administrative Record filed by Respondent EPA [ # 12 ] Administrative Record due on 07/21/2025 [25-60146] (ABT) [Entered: 05/29/2025 12:08 PM]
May 28, 2025 Filing 12 UNOPPOSED MOTION to extend time to file Administrative Record until 07/21/2025 [12]. Date of service: 05/28/2025 [25-60146] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Respondent EPA to extend time to file Administrative Record until [12]. Date of service: 05/28/2025 via email - Attorney for Respondents: Chaudhary, Dupre; Attorney for Petitioner: Killian [25-60146] (Phillip R. Dupre ) [Entered: 05/28/2025 08:33 AM]
April 24, 2025 Filing 10 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Respondent EPA. Extension Granted to and including 06/04/2025, for filing the Administrative Record. Administrative Record deadline updated to 06/04/2025. [25-60146] (DLJ) [Entered: 04/24/2025 03:32 PM]
April 24, 2025 Filing 9 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Respondent EPA for filing Certified Index to the Administrative Record until 06/04/2025 [25-60146] (Phillip R. Dupre ) [Entered: 04/24/2025 02:48 PM]
March 31, 2025 Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Phillip R. Dupre for party(s) Respondent EPA, in case 25-60146 [25-60146] (STH) [Entered: 03/31/2025 04:45 PM]
March 31, 2025 Filing 6 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [6] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [25-60146] (AMD) [Entered: 03/31/2025 04:08 PM]
March 31, 2025 Filing 5 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-60146] (Phillip R. Dupre ) [Entered: 03/31/2025 10:21 AM]
March 25, 2025 Filing 2 Attorney Dimple Chaudhary added as counsel of record for Respondent EPA in 25-60146 [25-60146] (MVM) [Entered: 03/25/2025 11:06 AM]
March 25, 2025 Filing 1 AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioners ARC Specialty Products and Balchem Corporation. Date received in 5th Circuit: 03/21/2025. Administrative Record due on 05/05/2025 [25-60146] (MVM) [Entered: 03/25/2025 11:04 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: ARC Spclt Prod v. EPA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ARC Specialty Products
Represented By: Bryan Michael Killian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Balchem Corporation, doing business as ARC Specialty Products
Represented By: Bryan Michael Killian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States Environmental Protection Agency
Represented By: Dimple Chaudhary
Represented By: Laura J. Glickman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?