Jordan v. Cain
| Michael Lee Jordan |
| Burl Cain, MDOC Commissioner; Official capacity, Brady Sistrunk, Warden of WGCF; Individual capacity and Official capacity, Steven Bell, Individual capacity and Official capacity, Patricia Diaz, Individual capacity and Official capacity, Frank Wright, Doctor and Laura Sullivan, Correctional Officer |
| 25-60187 |
| April 11, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prison Conditions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [9] [25-60187] (SR) [Entered: 08/06/2025 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 8 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 07/31/2025, for Appellant Michael Lee Jordan. [25-60187] (DLJ) [Entered: 07/28/2025 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 6 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 05/21/2025 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Michael Lee Jordan because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case. Fee or IFP motion filed in 5th Circuit due on 07/16/2025, for Appellant Michael Lee Jordan. [25-60187] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/16/2025 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 06/10/2025 for Appellant Michael Lee Jordan. [25-60187] (STH) [Entered: 04/16/2025 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Lee Jordan [25-60187] (STH) [Entered: 04/11/2025 03:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
