Douglas v. Cain
| William Frederick Douglas |
| Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Adewale Idowe, Unknown Greene, K-9 Officer, Unknown Waltzer, Nurse Practitioner and Unknown Davis, Nurse Practitioner |
| 25-60191 |
| April 15, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prison Conditions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. William Frederick Douglas. Fee deadline satisfied. [25-60191] (RA) [Entered: 08/05/2025 11:57 AM] |
| Filing 9 LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. William Frederick Douglas notifying the court that a motion for IFP has been filed in District Court. [25-60191] (RA) [Entered: 08/05/2025 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 7 UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. [25-60191] (RA) [Entered: 07/15/2025 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 6 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 07/08/2025 for Appellant William Frederick Douglas [25-60191] (RA) [Entered: 06/23/2025 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 06/16/2025 for Appellant William Frederick Douglas [25-60191] (AMD) [Entered: 04/22/2025 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. William Frederick Douglas [25-60191] (AMD) [Entered: 04/15/2025 09:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
