Moore v. Itawamba County
Plaintiff: Richard Matthew Moore
Defendant: Itawamba County, Mississippi, Justice Court Judge Harold Holcomb, in his official and personal capacities, Sheriff Mitchell Nabors, in his official and personal capacities and Bradford Nabors, in his official and personal capacities
Case Number: 25-60314
Filed: June 10, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 30, 2025 Moore v. Itawamba County

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2025 Filing 30 BRIEFING COMPLETE. [25-60314] (RLL) [Entered: 10/16/2025 05:03 PM]
October 16, 2025 Filing 29 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Richard Matthew Moore. # of Copies Provided: 8. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. [25-60314] (RLL) [Entered: 10/16/2025 05:03 PM]
October 16, 2025 Filing 28 CLERK ORDER granting in part Motion to file brief out of time filed by Appellant Mr. Richard Matthew Moore. [ # 23 ] [25-60314] (RLL) [Entered: 10/16/2025 04:50 PM]
October 14, 2025 Filing 23 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Richard Matthew Moore for leave to file brief out of time [23] - Brief Tendered? Yes. Date of service: 10/09/2025. [25-60314] (RLL) [Entered: 10/15/2025 04:08 PM]
September 29, 2025 Filing 21 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Brief of Appellant received from Appellant Mr. Richard Matthew Moore because a motion to file brief out of time must accompany the brief. Additionally, brief requires the following corrections: certificate of interested persons with signature. Dismissal remedy has been updated an additional 15 days to allow time to return the motion to file brief out of time. [25-60314] (RLL) [Entered: 09/30/2025 12:16 PM]
September 16, 2025 Filing 20 DISMISSAL NOTICE ISSUED for failure to file appellant's brief. [20] DIS-1 Remedy due on 10/01/2025 for Appellant Richard Matthew Moore. [25-60314] (RLL) [Entered: 09/16/2025 11:44 AM]
July 29, 2025 Filing 18 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 09/08/2025 for Appellant Richard Matthew Moore. [25-60314] (DDL) [Entered: 07/29/2025 04:19 PM]
July 29, 2025 Filing 17 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-60314] (DDL) [Entered: 07/29/2025 04:18 PM]
July 23, 2025 Filing 15 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:25-CV-12. Electronic ROA due on 08/07/2025. [25-60314] (RLL) [Entered: 07/23/2025 01:07 PM]
July 21, 2025 Filing 14 Affidavit of Financial Status treated as MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Richard Matthew Moore to proceed in forma pauperis [14] Fee deadline canceled. Date of service: 07/10/2025. [25-60314] (RLL) [Entered: 07/23/2025 01:03 PM]
June 18, 2025 Filing 13 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [13] [25-60314] (SH) [Entered: 06/18/2025 01:16 PM]
June 18, 2025 Filing 12 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [12] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee due on 07/18/2025 for Appellant Richard Matthew Moore [25-60314] (SH) [Entered: 06/18/2025 12:58 PM]
June 18, 2025 Filing 10 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 06/17/2025 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Richard Matthew Moore. [25-60314] (SH) [Entered: 06/18/2025 12:39 PM]
June 16, 2025 Filing 7 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Richard Matthew Moore. [25-60314] (SH) [Entered: 06/16/2025 04:08 PM]
June 16, 2025 Filing 4 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [4] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Richard Matthew Moore. [4] [25-60314] (SH) [Entered: 06/16/2025 03:51 PM]
June 10, 2025 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Richard Matthew Moore [25-60314] (MVM) [Entered: 06/10/2025 08:05 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Moore v. Itawamba County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Matthew Moore
Represented By: Richard Matthew Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Itawamba County, Mississippi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Justice Court Judge Harold Holcomb, in his official and personal capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheriff Mitchell Nabors, in his official and personal capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bradford Nabors, in his official and personal capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?