USA v. Muhammad
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Rasheed Ali Muhammad
Case Number: 25-60600
Filed: October 31, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Vacate Sentence (2255)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2026 Filing 21 BRIEF IN SUPPORT in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 20 ] Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [21] [25-60600] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Rasheed Ali Muhammad in support of Motion [ # 20 ]. Date of Service: 02/24/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Cleveland, Meynardie; Attorney for Appellant: McIntyre. [21] [25-60600] (Victoria Elizabeth McIntyre ) [Entered: 02/24/2026 02:23 PM]
February 24, 2026 Filing 20 MOTION for certificate of appealability [20]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [25-60600] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Rasheed Ali Muhammad for certificate of appealability [20]. Date of service: 02/24/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Cleveland, Meynardie; Attorney for Appellant: McIntyre [25-60600] (Victoria Elizabeth McIntyre ) [Entered: 02/24/2026 02:09 PM]
February 24, 2026 Filing 19 Motion due deadline updated to 03/10/2026 for Appellant Rasheed Ali Muhammad. Brief in Support deadline updated to 03/10/2026 for Appellant Rasheed Ali Muhammad. Counsel did not received inital NDA advising we were taking no action on the COA filings. [25-60600] (MVM) [Entered: 02/24/2026 09:53 AM]
February 12, 2026 Filing 18 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion for COA, breif in support because the documents must be filed using the appropriate event codes [25-60600] (KJ) [Entered: 02/23/2026 03:02 PM]
January 5, 2026 Filing 15 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Mr. Rasheed Ali Muhammad. Extension Granted to and including 02/12/2026. Motion due deadline updated to 02/12/2026 for Appellant Rasheed Ali Muhammad. Brief in Support deadline updated to 02/12/2026 for Appellant Rasheed Ali Muhammad [25-60600] (MVM) [Entered: 01/05/2026 11:47 AM]
January 2, 2026 Filing 14 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Mr. Rasheed Ali Muhammad for filing Application for Certificate of Appealability and Supporting Brief until 02/12/2026 [25-60600] (Victoria Elizabeth McIntyre ) [Entered: 01/02/2026 03:00 PM]
December 4, 2025 Filing 13 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 01/13/2026 for Appellant Rasheed Ali Muhammad. Brief in Support due on 01/13/2026 for Appellant Rasheed Ali Muhammad [25-60600] (DDL) [Entered: 12/04/2025 03:32 PM]
December 4, 2025 Filing 12 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-60600] (DDL) [Entered: 12/04/2025 03:32 PM]
November 11, 2025 Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:23-CV-95; 1:14-CR-36-2. Electronic ROA due on 11/26/2025. [25-60600] (MVM) [Entered: 11/11/2025 10:51 PM]
November 11, 2025 Filing 10 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [10] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [25-60600] (MVM) [Entered: 11/11/2025 10:48 PM]
November 4, 2025 Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Gaines H. Cleveland for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 25-60600, by Attorney Victoria Elizabeth McIntyre for Appellant Rasheed Ali Muhammad in 25-60600 [25-60600] (ABT) [Entered: 11/04/2025 02:56 PM]
November 3, 2025 Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-60600] (Gaines H. Cleveland ) [Entered: 11/03/2025 12:37 PM]
November 3, 2025 Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Rasheed Ali Muhammad advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [25-60600] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Rasheed Ali Muhammad advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 11/03/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellant: McIntyre; Attorney for Appellee: Meynardie [25-60600] (Victoria Elizabeth McIntyre ) [Entered: 11/03/2025 11:57 AM]
November 3, 2025 Filing 4 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Victoria Elizabeth McIntyre for Mr. Rasheed Ali Muhammad for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-60600] (Victoria Elizabeth McIntyre ) [Entered: 11/03/2025 11:54 AM]
October 31, 2025 Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITH COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Rasheed Ali Muhammad. [25-60600] (DLJ) [Entered: 10/31/2025 01:02 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Muhammad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: John Arthur Meynardie Esq.
Represented By: Gaines H. Cleveland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rasheed Ali Muhammad
Represented By: Victoria Elizabeth McIntyre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?