Ellis v. Vecchione
| Andy Ellis, Jr. |
| David Andrew Vecchione, Medical Doctor, Jonathan Bennett, Medtronic, Incorporated and John Does 1-10 |
| 25-60636 |
| November 18, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Personal Injury-Medical Malpractice |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [11] [25-60636] (SR) [Entered: 12/09/2025 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 8 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 filed by Appellant Mr. Andy Ellis, Jr. [ # 5 ] [25-60636] (SR) [Entered: 12/05/2025 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Heber S. Simmons III for Appellant Andy Ellis Jr. in 25-60636 [25-60636] (SR) [Entered: 12/05/2025 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Heber S. Simmons, III, Esq. for Mr. Andy Ellis, Jr. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [25-60636] (Heber S. Simmons III) [Entered: 12/05/2025 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 5 UNOPPOSED MOTION to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 [5]. Date of service: 12/05/2025 [25-60636] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Andy Ellis, Jr. to dismiss the appeal [5]. Date of service: 12/05/2025 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Lockard, Thompson, Upchurch; Attorney for Appellant: Simmons [25-60636] (Heber S. Simmons III) [Entered: 12/05/2025 09:23 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Andy Ellis, Jr. [25-60636] (KJ) [Entered: 11/18/2025 10:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
