Callicotte v. Collier
| Jason Colby Callicotte |
| Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, James Danheim, Tina Tompkins, Siedah Thomas, Schocolate Lewis, Ashley O'Neal, Pedro Boykin, Charlene Mickles and Kendra Piert |
| 25-90018 |
| June 20, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: requesting copies [25-90018] (RAJ) [Entered: 07/18/2025 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 19 COURT ORDER denying Motion for permission to appeal filed by Petitioner Mr. Jason Colby Callicotte [ # 2 ]. [25-90018] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/27/2025 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 9 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [25-90018] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/23/2025 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 1 MISCELLANEOUS CASE docketed. [25-90018] (AMD) [Entered: 06/20/2025 03:57 PM] |
| Filing 5 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion to Proceed In forma Pauperis received from Petitioner Mr. Jason Colby Callicotte because Not needed at this time. If motion granted, IFP motion will be processed. [25-90018] (AMD) [Entered: 06/20/2025 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioner Mr. Jason Colby Callicotte for permission to appeal [2] pursuant to Class Action Certification. Date received in 5th Circuit: 06/16/2025. Date of service: 06/10/2025 [25-90018] (AMD) [Entered: 06/20/2025 04:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
