Rogers v. Lhoist
Plaintiff: Timothy Rogers
Defendant: Lhoist North America of Texas, L.L.C.
Case Number: 26-10020
Filed: January 13, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs (Civil Rights)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2026 Filing 35 Paper copies of Appellant Reply Brief filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Rogers in 26-10020 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 6. Paper Copies of Brief due deadline satisfied. [26-10020] (OGA) [Entered: 06/30/2026 04:08 PM]
June 30, 2026 Filing 34 Paper copies of Record Excerpts filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Rogers in 26-10020 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 4. Paper Copies of Record Excerpts due deadline satisfied. [26-10020] (OGA) [Entered: 06/30/2026 03:58 PM]
June 30, 2026 Filing 33 Paper copies of Appellant Brief filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Rogers in 26-10020 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 6. [26-10020] (OGA) [Entered: 06/30/2026 03:53 PM]
June 26, 2026 Filing 32 PAPER COPIES REQUESTED for the Appellant Reply Brief filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Rogers in 26-10020 [ # 25 ], Appellee Brief filed by Appellee Lhoist North America of Texas, L.L.C. in 26-10020 [ # 24 ], Record Excerpts filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Rogers in 26-10020 [ # 22 ], Appellant Brief filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Rogers in 26-10020 [ # 21 ]. Paper Copies of Brief due on 07/01/2026 for Appellee Lhoist North America of Texas, L.L.C. and Appellant Timothy Rogers.. Paper Copies of Record Excerpts due on 07/01/2026 for Appellant Timothy Rogers. [26-10020] (OGA) [Entered: 06/26/2026 11:35 AM]
June 12, 2026 Filing 25 APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED Reply Brief deadline satisfied [26-10020] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED by Mr. Timothy Rogers. Date of service: 06/12/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Hoffman, Sanford, Sanford; Attorney for Appellee: Parker [26-10020] (Brian P. Sanford ) [Entered: 06/12/2026 07:32 PM]
May 22, 2026 Filing 24 APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED E/Res's Brief deadline satisfied. Reply Brief due on 06/12/2026 for Appellant Timothy Rogers [26-10020] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S MEMORANDUM BRIEF FILED by Lhoist North America of Texas, L.L.C.. Date of service: 05/22/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Hoffman, Sanford, Sanford; Attorney for Appellee: Parker [26-10020] (Talley Ray Parker ) [Entered: 05/22/2026 09:55 AM]
May 8, 2026 Filing 23 PROPOSED SUFFICIENT BRIEF filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Rogers [ # 21 ] Date of service: 05/08/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Hoffman, Sanford, Sanford; Attorney for Appellee: Parker [26-10020] (Elizabeth J. Sanford ) [Entered: 05/08/2026 02:58 PM]
April 22, 2026 Filing 22 RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. [26-10020] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Mr. Timothy Rogers. Date of service: 04/22/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Hoffman, Sanford, Sanford; Attorney for Appellee: Parker [26-10020] (Brian P. Sanford ) [Entered: 04/22/2026 06:04 PM]
April 22, 2026 Filing 21 SUFFICIENT APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED Sufficient Brief deadline satisfied [26-10020] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED Brief NOT Sufficient as it requires the record citations to be in proper format. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Sufficient Brief due on 05/08/2026 for Appellant Timothy Rogers. Appellee's Brief due on 05/22/2026 for Appellee Lhoist North America of Texas, L.L.C. [26-10020] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Timothy Rogers. Date of service: 04/22/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Hoffman, Sanford, Sanford; Attorney for Appellee: Parker [26-10020] (Brian P. Sanford ) [Entered: 04/22/2026 06:03 PM]
March 13, 2026 Filing 20 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Mr. Timothy Rogers. Extension Granted to and including 04/22/2026. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 04/22/2026 for Appellant Timothy Rogers [26-10020] (JAK) [Entered: 03/13/2026 08:14 AM]
March 12, 2026 Filing 19 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Mr. Timothy Rogers for filing Appellant Brief until 04/22/2026 [26-10020] (Brian P. Sanford ) [Entered: 03/12/2026 02:43 PM]
March 12, 2026 Filing 17 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Brian P. Sanford for Appellant Timothy Rogers in 26-10020 [26-10020] (PAC) [Entered: 03/12/2026 11:25 AM]
March 12, 2026 Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Emma Hoffman for party(s) Appellant Timothy Rogers, in case 26-10020 [26-10020] (PAC) [Entered: 03/12/2026 11:24 AM]
March 10, 2026 Filing 15 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Brian P. Sanford for Mr. Timothy Rogers for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-10020] (Brian P. Sanford ) [Entered: 03/10/2026 03:30 PM]
March 10, 2026 Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [26-10020] (Emma Hoffman ) [Entered: 03/10/2026 02:48 PM]
February 11, 2026 Filing 13 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 03/23/2026 for Appellant Timothy Rogers. [26-10020] (DDL) [Entered: 02/11/2026 10:01 AM]
February 11, 2026 Filing 12 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [26-10020] (DDL) [Entered: 02/11/2026 10:00 AM]
February 6, 2026 Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Elizabeth J. Sanford for party(s) Appellant Timothy Rogers, in case 26-10020 [26-10020] (RSM) [Entered: 02/06/2026 03:13 PM]
February 5, 2026 Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [26-10020] (Elizabeth J. Sanford ) [Entered: 02/05/2026 02:16 PM]
January 29, 2026 Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Talley Ray Parker for Appellee Lhoist North America of Texas, L.L.C. in 26-10020 [26-10020] (IAC) [Entered: 01/29/2026 04:16 PM]
January 28, 2026 Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Talley Ray Parker for Lhoist North America of Texas, L.L.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-10020] (Talley Ray Parker ) [Entered: 01/28/2026 08:37 AM]
January 27, 2026 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:24-CV-1223. Electronic ROA due on 02/11/2026. [26-10020] (RSM) [Entered: 01/27/2026 09:16 AM]
January 27, 2026 Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [26-10020] (RSM) [Entered: 01/27/2026 09:13 AM]
January 13, 2026 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Rogers [26-10020] (MBC) [Entered: 01/13/2026 09:17 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Rogers v. Lhoist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Rogers
Represented By: Brian P. Sanford
Represented By: Elizabeth J. Sanford
Represented By: Emma Hoffman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lhoist North America of Texas, L.L.C.
Represented By: Talley Ray Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?