Doe v. Hyatt Corporation
| Jane Doe, C.A.A., an individual |
| Hyatt Corporation, Hyatt Franchising, L.L.C., Firewheel Hotel Limited, Inter-Continental Hotels Group, Incorporated, Intercontinental Hotels Group (USA) Franchising, Incorporated, Holiday Hospitality Franchising, L.L.C., BDNKR Hospitality, L.P., Lotustel Group, L.L.C., Hyatt Place Franchising, L.L.C. and Six Continents Hotels, Incorporated |
| 26-10104 |
| February 12, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Personal Liability |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 04/27/2026 for Appellant Jane Doe. [26-10104] (NMF) [Entered: 03/16/2026 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 23 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [26-10104] (NMF) [Entered: 03/16/2026 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 21 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) John M. Hamrick for party(s) Appellee Holiday Hospitality Franchising, L.L.C. Appellee Six Continents Hotels, Incorporated, in case 26-10104 [26-10104] (LEF) [Entered: 03/06/2026 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 20 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-10104] (John M. Hamrick ) [Entered: 03/06/2026 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 18 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) John Andrew Hutton for party(s) Appellee Hyatt Franchising, L.L.C., in case 26-10104 [26-10104] (LEF) [Entered: 03/05/2026 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 17 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-10104] (John Andrew Hutton ) [Entered: 03/04/2026 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 15 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Richard Barrett Phillips Jr. for party(s) Appellee Holiday Hospitality Franchising, L.L.C. Appellee Six Continents Hotels, Incorporated, in case 26-10104 [26-10104] (LEF) [Entered: 02/27/2026 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [26-10104] (Richard Barrett Phillips Jr.) [Entered: 02/26/2026 07:48 PM] |
| Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Stephen Douglas Henninger for party(s) Appellee BDNKR Hospitality, L.P., in case 26-10104 [26-10104] (LEF) [Entered: 02/24/2026 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Thera Aschanta Cooper for Appellee Lotustel Group, L.L.C. in 26-10104, Attorney Thera Aschanta Cooper for Appellee Lotustel Group, L.L.C. in 26-10104 [26-10104] (LEF) [Entered: 02/24/2026 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Mark Joseph Dyer for Appellee BDNKR Hospitality, L.P. in 26-10104 [26-10104] (LEF) [Entered: 02/24/2026 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-10104] (Thera Aschanta Cooper ) [Entered: 02/23/2026 09:53 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [26-10104] (Stephen Douglas Henninger ) [Entered: 02/23/2026 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Mark Joseph Dyer, Esq. for BDNKR Hospitality, L.P. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-10104] (Mark Joseph Dyer ) [Entered: 02/23/2026 01:14 PM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:24-CV-1229. Electronic ROA due on 03/09/2026. [26-10104] (NMF) [Entered: 02/20/2026 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [26-10104] (NMF) [Entered: 02/20/2026 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Jane Doe [26-10104] (NMF) [Entered: 02/12/2026 09:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
