USA v. Jackson
| United States of America |
| Joseph Jackson |
| 26-10135 |
| February 19, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:22-CR-230-3. Electronic ROA due on 04/30/2026. [26-10135] (PAC) [Entered: 04/15/2026 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 13 TRANSCRIPT FILED IN DISTRICT COURT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Zoie Williams, Dt. Filed in Dist. Ct: 04/15/2026 Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date canceled [26-10135] (PAC) [Entered: 04/15/2026 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE RECEIVED that the transcript ordered by Appellant Mr. Joseph Jackson is complete and has been filed in the District Court. [26-10135] (Zoie Williams ) [Entered: 04/15/2026 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Zoie Williams, Est. Completion Dt: 04/06/2026, Est. No.of Pgs: 20, Dt. Fin Arrangements Made: 03/06/2026, Dt. Trans. to be Filed: 04/06/2026, Proceeding Type and Date: Revocation Hearing 02/11/2026. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment ddl satisfied. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 04/06/2026 for Zoie Williams, Court Reporter [26-10135] (EMF) [Entered: 03/17/2026 08:20 AM] |
| Filing 10 COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Court Reporter Ms. Zoie Williams. [26-10135] (Zoie Williams ) [Entered: 03/16/2026 06:33 PM] |
| Filing 9 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Joseph Jackson. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Zoie Williams, Proceeding Type and Date: Revocation Hearing 02/11/2026. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 03/16/2026 for Zoie Williams, Court Reporter. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 8 ] [26-10135] (PAC) [Entered: 03/06/2026 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. Joseph Jacksonfor the Court to process. Date of service: 03/06/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Hayworth; Attorney for Appellant: Nicholson. [26-10135] (Adam Nicholson ) [Entered: 03/06/2026 06:20 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Adam Nicholson for Appellant Joseph Jackson in 26-10135 [26-10135] (RLJ) [Entered: 02/20/2026 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Adam Nicholson for Mr. Joseph Jackson for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-10135] (Adam Nicholson ) [Entered: 02/19/2026 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 5 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. Transcript order due on 03/06/2026 for Appellant Joseph Jackson [26-10135] (MBC) [Entered: 02/19/2026 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 1 DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Joseph Jackson [26-10135] (MBC) [Entered: 02/19/2026 10:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Jackson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Gail A. Hayworth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Joseph Jackson | |
| Represented By: | Adam Nicholson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
