In re: Eric Ellis
| In re: Eric Ellis |
| 26-10212 |
| March 10, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Appearance Form received from Petitioner Mr. Eric Ellis. Pro Se/Prisoners NP Mandamus cases enter only the petitioner(s). There is no Respondent on the other side. [26-10212] (JJF) [Entered: 03/18/2026 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Petitioner Mr. Eric Ellis to proceed in forma pauperis [6] Fee deadline canceled. Date of service: 03/12/2026 [26-10212] (PAC) [Entered: 04/14/2026 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [26-10212] (CAG) [Entered: 03/10/2026 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION filed by Petitioner Mr. Eric Ellis for writ of mandamus [2]. Date received in 5th Circuit: 03/05/2026. Fee due on 04/09/2026 for Petitioner Eric Ellis. [26-10212] (CAG) [Entered: 03/10/2026 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [26-10212] (CAG) [Entered: 03/10/2026 02:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Eric Ellis | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: Eric Ellis | |
| Represented By: | Eric Ellis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.