Wilkerson v. Lafuente
| Senrick Shern Wilkerson |
| Steven Ryan Lafuente, individual and in his official capacity as Attorney, Calvin D. Johnson, individual and in his capacity as Attorney, Jon Allan Haslett, individual in his his capacity as Attorney, Destiny Rae Austin, individual and in his official capacity as Attorney, Dallas Police Department, as a government agency each officer or detective handling of said case, Dallas County Sheriff's Department, as a government agency each officer or detective handling of said case, Dallas County District Attorney's Office, as a local prosecutor agency for the county of Dallas and it's officers, John Does 1 to 10, Irving Police Department, State of Texas, Michael McMurray and Brooke Robb |
| 26-10272 |
| March 30, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [5] [26-10272] (CAS) [Entered: 05/15/2026 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 4 DISMISSAL NOTICE ISSUED for failure to pay fee [4] Fee deadline canceled. DIS-1 Remedy due on 05/08/2026 for Appellant Senrick Shern Wilkerson. [26-10272] (CAS) [Entered: 04/23/2026 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 3 FILING FEE IS REQUIRED. Fee due on 04/14/2026 for Appellant Senrick Shern Wilkerson [26-10272] (EMF) [Entered: 03/30/2026 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Senrick Shern Wilkerson [26-10272] (EMF) [Entered: 03/30/2026 03:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
