Looney v. Lisch
| Allen Eugene Looney, as CEO of LSE & R&D |
| David Lisch, David C. Gair, Stephen S. Mosher, Clark R. Cowley, Ricardo Lee & Associates Law Office, Douglas Clark, Douglas Clark, L.L.P., Whitaker Chalk Swindle & Schwartz, P.L.L.C., and foreign associates, Gray Reed & McGraw, IP Illustration, David Hassan and Bert the Spider |
| 26-10360 |
| April 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 67
JUDGMENT ENTERED AND FILED. Costs Taxed Against: Appellant. [26-10360] (RLJ) [Entered: 09/14/2026 11:18 AM]
|
|
Filing 66
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [26-10360 Affirmed ] Judge: CDK , Judge: SAH , Judge: DMD Mandate issue date is 11/05/2026 [26-10360] (RLJ) [Entered: 09/14/2026 11:15 AM]
|
|
Filing 65
BRIEFING COMPLETE. [26-10360] (RLJ) [Entered: 09/14/2026 11:10 AM]
|
|
Filing 53
FILING OVERDUE BRIEF NOTICE dated 08/13/2026 issued to Appellees Bert the Spider, Mr. David Hassan and IP Illustration. No response received. E/Res's Brief deadline canceled. Motion due deadline satisfied.. Reply Brief due on 09/21/2026 for Appellant Allen Eugene Looney [26-10360] (PAC) [Entered: 08/31/2026 11:42 AM]
|
|
Filing 52
APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED Reply Brief deadline satisfied [26-10360] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED by Mr. Allen Eugene Looney. Date of service: 08/25/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Brandon, Drabble, Harkins; Appellant Looney; US mail - Attorney for Appellees: Fugate, Stone [26-10360] (Allen Eugene Looney ) [Entered: 08/25/2026 06:25 AM]
|
|
Filing 51
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion for clarification of the reply brief deadline, alternatively for extension of time to file reply and for leave to file a supplemental reply brief received from Appellant Mr. Allen Eugene Looney because it is unnecessary. There is no deadline at this time to file a reply brief and the requests for an extension of time to file reply brief and for leave to file a supplemental reply brief are premature [26-10360] (LEF) [Entered: 08/18/2026 10:54 AM]
|
|
Filing 49
NOTICE ISSUED TO APPELLEE - Brief is overdue. Motion to file brief out of time due on 08/24/2026 for Appellees Bert the Spider, David Hassan and IP Illustration [26-10360] (LEF) [Entered: 08/13/2026 04:22 PM]
|
|
Filing 48
PROPOSED SUFFICIENT BRIEF filed by Appellee Gray Reed & McGraw [ # 47 ] Date of service: 08/04/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Brandon, Drabble, Fugate, Harkins, Stone; Appellant Looney; US mail - Attorney for Appellee: Fugate [26-10360] (William Nelson Drabble ) [Entered: 08/04/2026 04:43 PM]
|
|
Filing 47
SUFFICIENT APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED Sufficient Brief deadline satisfied [26-10360] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED Brief NOT Sufficient as it requires the Caption to be corrected. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. E/Res's Brief deadline satisfied. Sufficient Brief due on 08/18/2026 for Appellee Gray Reed & McGraw. [26-10360] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED by Gray Reed & McGraw. Date of service: 07/30/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Brandon, Drabble, Fugate, Harkins, Stone; Appellant Looney; US mail - Attorney for Appellees: Fugate, Stone [26-10360] (William Nelson Drabble ) [Entered: 07/30/2026 04:40 PM]
|
|
Filing 46
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the reply brief received from Appellant Mr. Allen Eugene Looney because it is premature [26-10360] (RSM) [Entered: 07/28/2026 03:23 PM]
|
|
Filing 44
CLERK ORDER denying Motion to file reply brief in excess of word count filed by Appellant Mr. Allen Eugene Looney [ # 40 ] [26-10360] (LEF) [Entered: 07/24/2026 04:17 PM]
|
|
Filing 40
OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Allen Eugene Looney to file brief in excess of the word count limitation but not to exceed Plaintiff-Appellant Allen Eugene Looney, proceeding pro se, respectfully moves for leave to file a Reply Brief containing approximately 7551 words, exceeding the 6,500-word limit by approximately 1,051 words. words [40]. Date of service: 07/17/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Brandon, Drabble, Harkins; Appellant Looney; US mail - Attorney for Appellees: Fugate, Stone [26-10360] (Allen Eugene Looney ) [Entered: 07/17/2026 09:28 PM]
|
|
Filing 39
CLERK ORDER denying Motion to extend time to return suff brief filed by Appellant Mr. Allen Eugene Looney [ # 31 ] [26-10360] (LEF) [Entered: 07/17/2026 04:30 PM]
|
|
Filing 34
PROPOSED SUFFICIENT BRIEF filed by Appellant Mr. Allen Eugene Looney [ # 27 ] Date of service: 07/14/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Brandon, Drabble, Harkins; Appellant Looney; US mail - Attorney for Appellees: Fugate, Stone [26-10360] (Allen Eugene Looney ) [Entered: 07/14/2026 06:42 AM]
|
|
Filing 33
LETTER filed - supplement to the certificate of conference appellees oppose the motions. [26-10360] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Allen Eugene Looney for leave to file document [33]. Date of service: 07/12/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Brandon, Drabble, Harkins; Appellant Looney; US mail - Attorney for Appellees: Fugate, Stone [26-10360] (Allen Eugene Looney ) [Entered: 07/13/2026 12:22 PM]
|
|
Filing 35
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion for a copy of the record on appeal and a motion to file a corrected brief received from Appellant Mr. Allen Eugene Looney because they are unnecessary. This court does not provide access to the record on appeal to anyone in any form. The district court provides the record in the form it chooses. A motion to file a corrected brief to correct the record citations is unnecessary in light of the clerk's office has requested that the citations be corrected. [26-10360] (LEF) [Entered: 07/16/2026 03:51 PM]
|
|
Filing 31
OPPOSED MOTION to extend time to return sufficient brief until 08/13/2026 [31]. [26-10360] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Allen Eugene Looney to extend time to file brief as appellant [31]. Date of service: 07/12/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Brandon, Drabble, Harkins; Appellant Looney; US mail - Attorney for Appellees: Fugate, Stone [26-10360] (Allen Eugene Looney ) [Entered: 07/12/2026 09:45 PM]
|
|
Filing 29
PROPOSED SUFFICIENT BRIEF filed by Appellant Mr. Allen Eugene Looney in 26-10360 [ # 27 ] Brief has been deemed insufficient. Corrections required: citations to the record. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. Sufficient Brief deadline updated to 07/28/2026 for Appellant Allen Eugene Looney [26-10360] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: PROPOSED SUFFICIENT BRIEF filed by Appellant Mr. Allen Eugene Looney [ # 27 ] Date of service: 07/12/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Brandon, Drabble, Harkins; Appellant Looney; US mail - Attorney for Appellees: Fugate, Stone [26-10360] (Allen Eugene Looney ) [Entered: 07/12/2026 09:19 PM]
|
|
Filing 28
APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED E/Res's Brief deadline satisfied [26-10360] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S MEMORANDUM BRIEF FILED by Mr. Clark R. Cowley, Mr. Stephen S. Mosher and Whitaker Chalk Swindle & Schwartz, P.L.L.C.. Date of service: 07/07/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Brandon, Drabble, Harkins; Appellant Looney; US mail - Attorney for Appellees: Fugate, Stone [26-10360] (Thomas S. Brandon Jr.) [Entered: 07/07/2026 12:09 PM]
|
|
Filing 27
SUFFICIENT APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED Sufficient Brief deadline satisfied [26-10360] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED Brief NOT Sufficient as it requires the citations to the record. Additionally the Brief requires signature, letter must be removed from brief. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Sufficient Brief due on 07/14/2026 for Appellant Allen Eugene Looney.. Appellee's Brief due on 07/30/2026 for Appellees Bert the Spider, Clark R. Cowley, Gray Reed & McGraw, David Hassan, IP Illustration, Stephen S. Mosher and Whitaker Chalk Swindle & Schwartz, P.L.L.C. [26-10360] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Allen Eugene Looney. Date of service: 06/30/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Brandon, Drabble, Harkins; Appellant Looney; US mail - Attorney for Appellees: Fugate, Stone [26-10360] (Allen Eugene Looney ) [Entered: 06/30/2026 05:02 AM]
|
|
Filing 26
CLERK ORDER granting Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant Mr. Allen Eugene Looney [ # 7 ] [26-10360] (NMF) [Entered: 05/27/2026 11:25 AM]
|
|
Filing 22
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/30/2026 for Appellant Allen Eugene Looney. [26-10360] (DDL) [Entered: 05/21/2026 10:28 AM]
|
|
Filing 21
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [26-10360] (DDL) [Entered: 05/21/2026 10:28 AM]
|
|
Filing 19
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) William Nelson Drabble for party(s) Appellee Gray Reed & McGraw, in case 26-10360 [26-10360] (RSM) [Entered: 05/13/2026 01:50 PM]
|
|
Filing 18
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-10360] (William Nelson Drabble ) [Entered: 05/13/2026 10:10 AM]
|
|
Filing 17
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:25-CV-118. Electronic ROA due on 05/20/2026. [26-10360] (RSM) [Entered: 05/05/2026 10:47 AM]
|
|
Filing 16
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [16] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [26-10360] (RSM) [Entered: 05/05/2026 10:40 AM]
|
|
Filing 13
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Thomas S. Brandon Jr. for Appellee Whitaker Chalk Swindle & Schwartz, P.L.L.C. in 26-10360, Attorney Thomas S. Brandon Jr. for Appellee Clark R. Cowley in 26-10360, Attorney Thomas S. Brandon Jr. for Appellee Stephen S. Mosher in 26-10360 [26-10360] (RSM) [Entered: 05/01/2026 03:04 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Thomas Franklin Harkins Jr. for party(s) Appellee Clark R. Cowley Appellee Whitaker Chalk Swindle & Schwartz, P.L.L.C. Appellee Stephen S. Mosher, in case 26-10360 [26-10360] (RSM) [Entered: 05/01/2026 02:59 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Thomas S. Brandon, Jr. for Mr. Clark R. Cowley, Mr. Stephen S. Mosher and Whitaker Chalk Swindle & Schwartz, P.L.L.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-10360] (Thomas S. Brandon Jr.) [Entered: 04/29/2026 09:50 AM]
|
|
Filing 10
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [26-10360] (Thomas Franklin Harkins Jr.) [Entered: 04/29/2026 09:38 AM]
|
|
Filing 8
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion for leave to file electronically as a pro se party received from Appellant Mr. Allen Eugene Looney because it is a duplicate of the motion filed on April 21, 2026 [26-10360] (LEF) [Entered: 04/23/2026 02:58 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the transcript order forms received from Appellant Mr. Allen Eugene Looney because they are duplicates of the form previously filed on April 21, 2026 [26-10360] (LEF) [Entered: 04/23/2026 02:21 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Allen Eugene Looney for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [7]. Date of service: 04/21/2026 [26-10360] (LEF) [Entered: 04/23/2026 02:46 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Allen Eugene Looney advising transcript unnecessary - no hearings [26-10360] (LEF) [Entered: 04/23/2026 02:06 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
PARTY LIMIT CASE. (FOR A FULL LIST OF PARTIES FOR THIS APPEAL, PLEASE REFER TO THE DISTRICT COURT'S DOCKET SHEET.) [26-10360] (LEF) [Entered: 04/20/2026 11:14 AM]
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Allen Eugene Looney [26-10360] (LEF) [Entered: 04/20/2026 11:10 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
