Salazar v. Lockheed Martin
Plaintiff: Marc Gabriel Salazar
Defendant: Lockheed Martin Corporation
Case Number: 26-10600
Filed: June 29, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2026 Filing 22 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:25-CV-1364. Electronic ROA due on 09/02/2026. [26-10600] (RSM) [Entered: 08/18/2026 03:34 PM]
August 18, 2026 Filing 21 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [21] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [26-10600] (RSM) [Entered: 08/18/2026 03:32 PM]
July 27, 2026 Filing 17 FEE PAID by Appellant Mr. Marc Gabriel Salazar. [26-10600] (LEF) [Entered: 07/27/2026 03:10 PM]
July 22, 2026 Filing 15 LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Marc Gabriel Salazar - copy of the receipt showing that the fee was paid in district court. [26-10600] (LEF) [Entered: 07/27/2026 03:08 PM]
July 21, 2026 Filing 13 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Marc Gabriel Salazar. Fee deadline satisfied. [26-10600] (JAK) [Entered: 07/21/2026 02:58 PM]
July 21, 2026 Filing 11 CLERK ORDER reinstating case [11] [26-10600] (JAK) [Entered: 07/21/2026 02:52 PM]
July 20, 2026 Filing 14 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion to reinstate appeal received from Appellant Mr. Marc Gabriel Salazar because it is unnecessary. The appeal was reinstated on July 21, 2026 [26-10600] (LEF) [Entered: 07/23/2026 04:31 PM]
July 20, 2026 Filing 9 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [9] [26-10600] (JAK) [Entered: 07/20/2026 02:00 PM]
July 9, 2026 Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Molly Ann Lawrence for party(s) Appellee Lockheed Martin Corporation, in case 26-10600 [26-10600] (PAC) [Entered: 07/09/2026 07:57 AM]
July 9, 2026 Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jamie Brod Ashton for Appellee Lockheed Martin Corporation in 26-10600 [26-10600] (PAC) [Entered: 07/09/2026 07:55 AM]
July 8, 2026 Filing 5 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [26-10600] (Molly Ann Lawrence ) [Entered: 07/08/2026 10:42 AM]
July 8, 2026 Filing 4 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mrs. Jamie Brod Ashton for Lockheed Martin Corporation for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-10600] (Jamie Brod Ashton ) [Entered: 07/08/2026 07:26 AM]
June 29, 2026 Filing 3 FILING FEE IS REQUIRED. Fee due on 07/14/2026 for Appellant Marc Gabriel Salazar [26-10600] (CAG) [Entered: 06/29/2026 04:17 PM]
June 29, 2026 Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Marc Gabriel Salazar [26-10600] (CAG) [Entered: 06/29/2026 04:05 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Salazar v. Lockheed Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marc Gabriel Salazar
Represented By: Marc Gabriel Salazar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lockheed Martin Corporation
Represented By: Jamie Brod Ashton
Represented By: Molly Ann Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?