Gulledge v. Marshall
| Craig Cary Gulledge |
| William K. Marshall, III, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons |
| 26-10641 |
| July 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 FILING FEE IS REQUIRED. Fee due on 07/30/2026 for Appellant Craig Cary Gulledge [26-10641] (CAS) [Entered: 07/15/2026 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 2 CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for William K. Marshall III in 26-10641. Update: party text added. [26-10641] (CAS) [Entered: 07/15/2026 08:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Craig Cary Gulledge [26-10641] (CAS) [Entered: 07/15/2026 08:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Gulledge v. Marshall | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Craig Cary Gulledge | |
| Represented By: | Craig Cary Gulledge |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: William K. Marshall, III, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.