Gulledge v. Marshall
Petitioner: Craig Cary Gulledge
Respondent: William K. Marshall, III, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Case Number: 26-10641
Filed: July 15, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2026 Filing 4 FILING FEE IS REQUIRED. Fee due on 07/30/2026 for Appellant Craig Cary Gulledge [26-10641] (CAS) [Entered: 07/15/2026 08:58 AM]
July 15, 2026 Filing 2 CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for William K. Marshall III in 26-10641. Update: party text added. [26-10641] (CAS) [Entered: 07/15/2026 08:47 AM]
July 15, 2026 Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Craig Cary Gulledge [26-10641] (CAS) [Entered: 07/15/2026 08:44 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gulledge v. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Craig Cary Gulledge
Represented By: Craig Cary Gulledge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William K. Marshall, III, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?