Jones v. Mansfield Indep Sch Dist
| Joyce L. Jones |
| Mansfield Independent School District, Kourtney Gates, in her official capacity as Principal of Brook Wester MS and Kimberley Cantu |
| 26-10653 |
| July 17, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Jobs (Civil Rights) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:25-CV-916. Electronic ROA due on 09/02/2026. [26-10653] (CAG) [Entered: 08/18/2026 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 9 SIGNED NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED filed by Appellant Ms. Joyce L. Jones. [26-10653] (CAG) [Entered: 08/18/2026 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Grant Moore for Appellee Kimberley Cantu in 26-10653, Attorney Grant Moore for Appellee Kourtney Gates in 26-10653, Attorney Grant Moore for Appellee Mansfield Independent School District in 26-10653 [26-10653] (RSM) [Entered: 08/14/2026 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Grant Moore for Ms. Kimberley Cantu, Ms. Kourtney Gates and Mansfield Independent School District for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-10653] (Grant Moore ) [Entered: 08/12/2026 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Miscellaneous due on 09/09/2026 for Appellant Joyce L. Jones for signed NOA. [26-10653] (RSM) [Entered: 08/10/2026 01:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Joyce L. Jones [26-10653] (MFY) [Entered: 07/17/2026 12:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
