Sullivan v. Guerrero
| Albert Darcell Sullivan, Jr. |
| Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
| 26-10677 |
| July 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 FILING FEE IS REQUIRED. Fee due on 08/07/2026 for Appellant Albert Darcell Sullivan Jr. [26-10677] (RLJ) [Entered: 07/23/2026 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Albert Darcell Sullivan, Jr. [26-10677] (RLJ) [Entered: 07/23/2026 04:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Sullivan v. Guerrero | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Albert Darcell Sullivan, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Albert Darcell Sullivan Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.