USA v. Maret
| United States of America |
| Christopher Eugene Maret |
| 26-10953 |
| October 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Christy Martin for Mr. Christopher Eugene Maret for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-10953] (Christy Martin ) [Entered: 10/15/2026 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 5 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. Transcript order due on 10/30/2026 for Appellant Christopher Eugene Maret [26-10953] (IAC) [Entered: 10/15/2026 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Christopher Eugene Maret [26-10953] (IAC) [Entered: 10/15/2026 02:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Maret | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Gail A. Hayworth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Christopher Eugene Maret | |
| Represented By: | Christy Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
