In re: Christian Heineking
| In re: Christian Heineking |
| United States Equestrian Federation, Incorporated, a New York corporation and United States Center for Safesport, Incorporated, a Colorado corporation |
| 26-10993 |
| October 27, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 LETTER filed by Petitioner Mr. Christian Heineking Notice of Scrivener's Error in Petition for a Writ of Mandamus. Date of Service: 11/02/2026 via email - Attorney for Petitioners: Cech Samole, Yagoda; Attorney for Respondents: Ewert, Strawn [26-10993] (Jay A. Yagoda ) [Entered: 11/02/2026 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Jay A. Yagoda for Mr. Christian Heineking for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-10993] (Jay A. Yagoda ) [Entered: 11/02/2026 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Brigid F. Cech Samole for Mr. Christian Heineking for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [26-10993] (Brigid F. Cech Samole ) [Entered: 11/02/2026 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 6 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [26-10993] (RLJ) [Entered: 10/27/2026 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Petition for writ of mandamus [ # 3 ] filed by Petitioner Mr. Christian Heineking Date of Service: 10/23/2026 [26-10993] (RLJ) [Entered: 10/27/2026 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION filed by Petitioner Mr. Christian Heineking for writ of mandamus [3] Date received in 5th Circuit: 10/23/2026.. Date of Service: 10/23/2026 [26-10993] (RLJ) [Entered: 10/27/2026 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [26-10993] (RLJ) [Entered: 10/27/2026 03:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
