DeLeon v. Lubbock County Detention Ctr
| David DeLeon, also known as David de Rothschild, also known as David Madrigal Ramirez de Rothschild DeLeon |
| Lubbock County Detention Center |
| 26-11026 |
| November 4, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 FILING FEE is required. Fee deadline updated to 12/14/2026 for Appellant David DeLeon [26-11026] (BLG) [Entered: 11/04/2026 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. David DeLeon [26-11026] (BLG) [Entered: 11/04/2026 12:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: DeLeon v. Lubbock County Detention Ctr | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lubbock County Detention Center | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David DeLeon, also known as David de Rothschild, also known as David Madrigal Ramirez de Rothschild DeLeon | |
| Represented By: | David DeLeon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
