Williams v. Estelle Unit Prison
| Roy Williams |
| Estelle Unit Prison Officials, Jacob Little, Sergeant Zachary T. Anderson, Dennis N. Ayienda, Onyinye Omeludike, Azeez O. Sanusi, Diogene Simo Wassu, Dominick Yanez, Nurse Northcutt and Major Brumley |
| 26-20176 |
| April 17, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 05/12/2026 denying IFP without prejudice for Appellant Mr. Roy Williams. Fee or sufficient IFP motion filed in District Court due on 07/06/2026, for Appellant Roy Williams. [26-20176] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/04/2026 01:24 PM] |
| Filing 5 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Roy Williams. Fee deadline satisfied. [26-20176] (RA) [Entered: 05/13/2026 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Roy Williams informing this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending in the district court. [26-20176] (RA) [Entered: 05/13/2026 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the appellant's brief received from Appellant Mr. Roy Williams because it is premature. [26-20176] (RA) [Entered: 05/13/2026 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 FILING FEE IS REQUIRED. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 06/11/2026 for Appellant Roy Williams. [26-20176] (RLL) [Entered: 04/17/2026 08:51 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Roy Williams. [26-20176] (RLL) [Entered: 04/17/2026 08:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
