Searcy v. Harris County
| Bradley Searcy |
| Harris County, Galveston County, Ashley Limas, Probation Officer, Supervisors of Ashley Limas, K. Dunn, Sergeant of Galveston County Jail and C. Rodriguez, Correctional Officer |
| 26-20297 |
| June 5, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the letter received from Appellant Mr. Bradley Searcy because we are unable to determine the relief that is being sought. [26-20297] (SH) [Entered: 07/13/2026 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the letter from appellant received from Appellant Mr. Bradley Searcy because we are unable to determine the relief he is seeking. [26-20297] (SEP) [Entered: 06/25/2026 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 5 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: Advising Appellant that we are unable to determine the relief he is seeking in his 06/10/2026 letter. [26-20297] (SEP) [Entered: 06/25/2026 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 4 LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Bradley Searcy elaborating on issues with prison staff. [26-20297] (SH) [Entered: 06/16/2026 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 3 FILING FEE IS REQUIRED. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 07/30/2026 for Appellant Bradley Searcy [26-20297] (SR) [Entered: 06/05/2026 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Bradley Searcy [26-20297] (SR) [Entered: 06/05/2026 02:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
