Gunter v. Exxon Mobil
| Kyle Gunter |
| XTO Energy, Exxon Mobil, Bryan Bollinger, Preeti Chewlee and Jijesh Varghese |
| 26-20328 |
| June 18, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Kyle Gunter. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Appellee's Brief due on 09/02/2026 for Appellee Exxon Mobil [26-20328] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Kyle Gunter. Date of service: 08/03/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Bills, Cheeseman, Clark, Jones; Appellant Gunter; clerk - Appellant Gunter [26-20328] (Kyle Gunter ) [Entered: 08/03/2026 06:27 PM] |
| Filing 19 CASE CAPTION updated. Involvement terminated for Appellees XTO Energy, Bryan Bollinger, Preeti Chewlee and Jijesh Varghese in 26-20328. Reason: incorrectly added at case opening; only Appellee is Exxon Mobil. [26-20328] (RLL) [Entered: 07/10/2026 05:10 PM] |
| Filing 23 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kelli Benham Bills for party(s) Appellee Exxon Mobil, in case 26-20328. [26-20328] (SEP) [Entered: 07/13/2026 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 22 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Brooke Jones for party(s) Appellee Exxon Mobil, in case 26-20328. [26-20328] (SEP) [Entered: 07/13/2026 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 21 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kimberly Frances Cheeseman for party(s) Appellee Exxon Mobil, in case 26-20328. [26-20328] (SEP) [Entered: 07/13/2026 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 20 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Shauna Johnson Clark for Appellee Exxon Mobil in 26-20328. [26-20328] (SEP) [Entered: 07/13/2026 09:38 AM] |
| Filing 18 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [26-20328] (Kelli Benham Bills ) [Entered: 07/06/2026 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 17 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [26-20328] (Brooke Jones ) [Entered: 07/06/2026 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [26-20328] (Kimberly Frances Cheeseman ) [Entered: 07/06/2026 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 15 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-20328] (Shauna Johnson Clark ) [Entered: 07/06/2026 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 14 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 08/10/2026 for Appellant Kyle Gunter. [26-20328] (DDL) [Entered: 07/01/2026 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 13 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [26-20328] (DDL) [Entered: 07/01/2026 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 12 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Kyle Gunter advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. No hearings. [26-20328] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/25/2026 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 11 CLERK ORDER granting Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant Mr. Kyle Gunter [ # 7 ] [26-20328] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/24/2026 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Kyle Gunter for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [7]. [26-20328] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/23/2026 12:47 PM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:25-CV-6356. Electronic ROA due on 07/06/2026. [26-20328] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/18/2026 10:10 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [26-20328] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/18/2026 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Kyle Gunter. [26-20328] (RLL) [Entered: 06/18/2026 08:48 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
