Swint v. NASA
| Robert James Swint |
| National Aeronautics and Space Administration, also known as National Aeronautics and Space Administration |
| 26-20349 |
| June 29, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Mandamus & Other (Prisoner) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 FILING FEE IS REQUIRED. Fee due on 07/14/2026 for Appellant Robert James Swint [26-20349] (AMD) [Entered: 06/29/2026 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Robert James Swint [26-20349] (AMD) [Entered: 06/29/2026 11:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Swint v. NASA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert James Swint | |
| Represented By: | Robert James Swint |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, also known as National Aeronautics and Space Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
