Simmons Bank v. Cinch Energy Services
| Simmons Bank |
| Cinch Energy Services, L.L.C., Mark Lopez and Frank Thomas Shumate, Jr. |
| 26-20436 |
| August 7, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Negotiable instruments |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42, for failure to order transcript and make financial arrangements with court reporter[12]. [26-20436] (DLJ) [Entered: 09/23/2026 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Brian T. Morris for Appellee Simmons Bank in 26-20436, Attorney Nicholas Stevens for Appellee Simmons Bank in 26-20436 [26-20436] (ABT) [Entered: 08/19/2026 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-20436] (Brian T. Morris ) [Entered: 08/18/2026 01:28 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Nicholas Stevens for Simmons Bank for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [26-20436] (Nicholas Stevens ) [Entered: 08/18/2026 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 7 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [7] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 09/02/2026 for Appellants Cinch Energy Services, L.L.C., Mark Lopez and Frank Thomas Shumate Jr. [26-20436] (ABT) [Entered: 08/18/2026 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Cinch Energy Services, L.L.C., Mr. Mark Lopez and Mr. Frank Thomas Shumate, Jr. [26-20436] (SH) [Entered: 08/07/2026 10:01 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
