Adams v. Velocity Commercial Capital
| Saran Adams, a natural, God-created woman |
| Velocity Commercial Capital, L.L.C., a California corporation |
| 26-20460 |
| August 13, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 FILING FEE IS REQUIRED. Fee due on 08/28/2026 for Appellant Saran Adams [26-20460] (SH) [Entered: 08/13/2026 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Saran Adams [26-20460] (SH) [Entered: 08/13/2026 09:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Adams v. Velocity Commercial Capital | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Saran Adams, a natural, God-created woman | |
| Represented By: | Saran Adams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Velocity Commercial Capital, L.L.C., a California corporation | |
| Represented By: | Nabeel M. Zuberi |
| Represented By: | Steven Price Nixon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
