Dukes v. Gautreaux
| Kevin Hewitt Dukes |
| Sidney Gautreaux, In his individual capacity, East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Office, Michael Canella, In his individual capacity, Scott Henning, In his individual capacity, Hillar Moore, In her individual capacity, East Baton Rouge District Attorney Office, Irena Zajickova, In her individual capacity, Tarvald Smith, In his individual capacity, Unknown Does, Pamela Bondi, U.S. Attorney General, Clerk of Court, 19th JDC, Judge Carson Marcantel, for judicial misconduct, Lafayette Parish Sheriff's Office and its deputies, Elizabeth B. Murrill, Attorney General, State of Louisiana and Jeffrey M. Landry, Govenor, State of Louisiana |
| 26-30019 |
| January 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 03/25/2026 for Appellant Kevin Hewitt Dukes. [26-30019] (DDL) [Entered: 02/13/2026 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 15 SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. Admitted Exhibits are on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on file in District Court? No. [26-30019] (DDL) [Entered: 02/13/2026 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 14 COURT ACTION withdrawing Affidavit filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin Hewitt Dukes [ # 10 ] [26-30019] (RA) [Entered: 02/06/2026 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 13 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:25-CV-76. Electronic ROA due on 02/23/2026. [26-30019] (RA) [Entered: 02/06/2026 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 12 CORRECTED AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin Hewitt Dukes in support of the Motion to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin Hewitt Dukes in 26-30019 [ # 9 ].. Affidavit deadline satisfied. [26-30019] (RA) [Entered: 02/06/2026 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [26-30019] (DDL) [Entered: 02/02/2026 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 10 WITHDRAWN AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin Hewitt Dukes in support of the Motion to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin Hewitt Dukes in 26-30019 [ # 9 ]. Affidavit is insufficient for the following reasons: Does not contain all required financial information. PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. [26-30019] (RA) [Entered: 01/28/2026 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin Hewitt Dukes to proceed in forma pauperis [9] Fee deadline canceled. Affidavit due on 02/18/2026 for Appellant Kevin Hewitt Dukes. Date of service: 01/28/2026 [26-30019] (RA) [Entered: 01/28/2026 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 8 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 01/23/2026 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Kevin Hewitt Dukes. Fee due on 01/28/2026 for Appellant Kevin Hewitt Dukes [26-30019] (RA) [Entered: 01/28/2026 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 7 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Appellant's brief received from Appellant Mr. Kevin Hewitt Dukes because it is premature [26-30019] (RA) [Entered: 01/28/2026 01:48 PM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:25-CV-76. Electronic ROA due on 02/09/2026. [26-30019] (SR) [Entered: 01/23/2026 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [26-30019] (SR) [Entered: 01/23/2026 01:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin Hewitt Dukes [26-30019] (SR) [Entered: 01/15/2026 08:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
