DeSelle v. Lafayette City-Parish
| Michael DeSelle, Rebecca Guidry, EPH320 L.L.C. and Stellarising L.L.C. |
| Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government |
| 26-30179 |
| April 1, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/29/2026 for Appellants Michael DeSelle, EPH320 L.L.C., Rebecca Guidry and Stellarising L.L.C.. [26-30179] (PAC) [Entered: 05/18/2026 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 18 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [26-30179] (PAC) [Entered: 05/18/2026 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM(S) FILED by Attorney Chloe Marie Chetta for Appellee Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government in 26-30179, by Attorney Judy Y. Barrasso for party Appellee Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government, in case 26-30179 [26-30179] (KJ) [Entered: 05/11/2026 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 15 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [26-30179] (Judy Y. Barrasso ) [Entered: 05/11/2026 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Chloe Marie Chetta for Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-30179] (Chloe Marie Chetta ) [Entered: 05/11/2026 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 13 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Mr. Michael DeSelle, EPH320 L.L.C., Ms. Rebecca Guidry and Stellarising L.L.C. advising transcript unnecessary - no hearings [26-30179] (ABT) [Entered: 05/04/2026 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellants Mr. Michael DeSelle, EPH320 L.L.C., Ms. Rebecca Guidry and Stellarising L.L.C.for the Court to process. Date of service: 05/04/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Chetta; Attorney for Appellants: Clement, Cunningham, Lawrence, Pallaki. [26-30179] (Paul D. Clement ) [Entered: 05/04/2026 09:14 AM] |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 6:25-CV-835. Electronic ROA due on 05/19/2026. [26-30179] (ABT) [Entered: 05/04/2026 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Mitchell Keshava Pallaki, Paul D. Clement for party(s) Appellant Michael DeSelle Appellant Stellarising L.L.C. Appellant EPH320 L.L.C. Appellant Rebecca Guidry, in case 26-30179, by Attorney Andrew Lawrence for Appellant Stellarising L.L.C. in 26-30179, Attorney Andrew Lawrence for Appellant EPH320 L.L.C. in 26-30179, Attorney Andrew Lawrence for Appellant Rebecca Guidry in 26-30179, Attorney Andrew Lawrence for Appellant Michael DeSelle in 26-30179 [26-30179] (ABT) [Entered: 05/04/2026 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [26-30179] (Mitchell Keshava Pallaki ) [Entered: 05/01/2026 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Andrew Lawrence for Mr. Michael DeSelle, EPH320 L.L.C., Ms. Rebecca Guidry and Stellarising L.L.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [26-30179] (Andrew Lawrence ) [Entered: 05/01/2026 01:14 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-30179] (Paul D. Clement ) [Entered: 05/01/2026 01:04 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [26-30179] (KJ) [Entered: 04/17/2026 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mr. Michael DeSelle, EPH320 L.L.C., Ms. Rebecca Guidry and Stellarising L.L.C. [26-30179] (AMD) [Entered: 04/01/2026 03:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
