Shengjie ChengIn re: Shengjie Cheng
| In re: Shengjie Cheng, Marvellous Pirate |
| United States of America |
| 26-30354 |
| June 10, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [26-30354] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/10/2026 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION filed by Petitioner Mr. Shengjie Cheng for writ of mandamus [2]. Date received in 5th Circuit: 06/08/2026. Date of Service: 06/08/2026. [26-30354] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/10/2026 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [26-30354] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/10/2026 01:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Shengjie ChengIn re: Shengjie Cheng | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: Shengjie Cheng, Marvellous Pirate | |
| Represented By: | Steven J. Moore |
| Represented By: | John S. McLindon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Edward Warner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
