USA v. Thomas
| United States of America |
| Gary Dewayne Thomas |
| 26-30381 |
| June 25, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-30381] (Dustin Charles Talbot ) [Entered: 06/26/2026 09:38 AM] |
| Filing 3 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. Transcript order due on 07/10/2026 for Appellant Gary Dewayne Thomas [26-30381] (SR) [Entered: 06/25/2026 07:54 AM] |
| Filing 1 DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Gary Dewayne Thomas [26-30381] (SR) [Entered: 06/25/2026 07:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Thomas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Camille Ann Domingue |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gary Dewayne Thomas | |
| Represented By: | Betty Lee Marak Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
