Prime Holdings Insurance SvcIn re: Prime Holdings Insurance Svc
| In re: Prime Holdings Insurance Services, Incorporated and Prime Insurance Company |
| Lucy G. Sikes, Terry Graham, Degan Blanchard & Nash and Paul Eckert |
| 26-30410 |
| June 30, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney W. Scott Hastings for Petitioner Prime Insurance Company in 26-30410, Attorney W. Scott Hastings for Petitioner Prime Holdings Insurance Services, Incorporated in 26-30410 [26-30410] (MVM) [Entered: 07/01/2026 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. W. Scott Hastings, Esq. for Prime Holdings Insurance Services, Incorporated and Prime Insurance Company for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-30410] (W. Scott Hastings ) [Entered: 06/30/2026 06:24 PM] |
| Filing 5 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [26-30410] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/30/2026 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 3 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Petition for writ of mandamus [ # 2 ] filed by Petitioners Prime Holdings Insurance Services, Incorporated and Prime Insurance Company. Date of Service: 06/29/2026. [26-30410] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/30/2026 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION filed by Petitioners Prime Holdings Insurance Services, Incorporated and Prime Insurance Company for writ of mandamus [2]. Date received in 5th Circuit: 06/29/2026. Date of Service: 06/29/2026. [26-30410] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/30/2026 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [26-30410] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/30/2026 02:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.