Smith v. Day
| Donald Ray Smith |
| Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center and Rayburn Correctional Center |
| 26-30437 |
| July 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS filed by Appellant Mr. Donald Ray Smith in support of the Motion to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mr. Donald Ray Smith in 26-30437 [ # 6 ], Motion to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Donald Ray Smith in 26-30437 [ # 7 ].. Affidavit deadline satisfied. [26-30437] (SH) [Entered: 09/15/2026 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Donald Ray Smith to appoint counsel [7]. Date of service: 08/18/2026 [26-30437] (SH) [Entered: 09/03/2026 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Donald Ray Smith to proceed in forma pauperis [6] Fee deadline canceled. Affidavit due on 09/16/2026 for Appellant Donald Ray Smith. Date of service: 08/18/2026 [26-30437] (SH) [Entered: 08/26/2026 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 5 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 08/25/2026 for Appellant Donald Ray Smith [26-30437] (SH) [Entered: 08/10/2026 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 3 FILING FEE IS REQUIRED. Fee due on 08/04/2026 for Appellant Donald Ray Smith [26-30437] (JAK) [Entered: 07/20/2026 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Donald Ray Smith [26-30437] (JAK) [Entered: 07/20/2026 09:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
