Howard v. Hamadeh
| Raheem Howard |
| Yuseff Hamadeh |
| 26-30455 |
| July 27, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. Yuseff Hamadehfor the Court to process. Date of service: 07/28/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Foco, Rauschenberger; Attorney for Appellees: Haley, Long, Moore, Unglesby; US mail - Attorney for Appellee: Moore. [26-30455] (Henry Steven Rauschenberger ) [Entered: 07/28/2026 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Phillip Edward Foco for Appellant Yuseff Hamadeh in 26-30455, Attorney Henry Steven Rauschenberger for Appellant Yuseff Hamadeh in 26-30455, by Attorney(s) Michael Beck for party(s) Appellant Yuseff Hamadeh, in case 26-30455 [26-30455] (SR) [Entered: 07/28/2026 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [26-30455] (Michael Beck ) [Entered: 07/28/2026 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Phillip Edward Foco for Mr. Yuseff Hamadeh for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [26-30455] (Phillip Edward Foco ) [Entered: 07/28/2026 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Henry Steven Rauschenberger for Mr. Yuseff Hamadeh for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-30455] (Henry Steven Rauschenberger ) [Entered: 07/28/2026 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Yuseff Hamadeh [26-30455] (AMD) [Entered: 07/27/2026 02:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
