Walker v. State of Texas
| Calvin Gary Walker |
| State of Texas |
| 26-40010 |
| January 7, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 43 SUPREME COURT ORDER received denying petition for writ of certiorari filed by Appellant Mr. Calvin Gary Walker in 26-40010 on 06/15/2026. [43] [26-40010] (MVM) [Entered: 06/16/2026 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 42 SUPREME COURT NOTICE that petition for writ of certiorari [42] was filed by Appellant Mr. Calvin Gary Walker on 04/01/2026. Supreme Court Number: 25-7191. [26-40010] (MVM) [Entered: 04/17/2026 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 41 MANDATE ISSUED. Mandate issue date satisfied. [26-40010] (MVM) [Entered: 04/10/2026 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 40 COURT ORDER denying Motion for reconsideration filed by Appellant Mr. Calvin Gary Walker [ # 33 ] [26-40010] (MVM) [Entered: 03/26/2026 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 33 Motion for Panel Rehearing TREATED AS a MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Calvin Gary Walker for reconsideration of the 03/20/2026 court order denying Motion for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Mr. Calvin Gary Walker in 26-40010 [ # 13 ] [33]. [26-40010] (MVM) [Entered: 03/25/2026 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 31 COURT ORDER denying Motion for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Mr. Calvin Gary Walker [ # 13 ]; denying Motion to stay district court proceedings [ # 10 ]. Mandate issue date is 04/10/2026. [26-40010] (MVM) [Entered: 03/20/2026 07:35 AM] |
| Filing 19 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion to supplement the record received from Appellant Mr. Calvin Gary Walker because it is unnecessary as the court already has a copy of the entire record on appeal [26-40010] (MVM) [Entered: 02/20/2026 08:18 AM] |
| Filing 17 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [26-40010] (MVM) [Entered: 02/20/2026 07:47 AM] |
| Filing 16 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Calvin Gary Walker because it is unnecessary as the fee was paid on 1/29/26 [26-40010] (MVM) [Entered: 02/10/2026 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 15 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Calvin Gary Walker advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [26-40010] (MVM) [Entered: 02/10/2026 08:40 AM] |
| Filing 14 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Calvin Gary Walker in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 13 ] (INCORPORATED IN MOTION FOR COA) Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [14] [26-40010] (MVM) [Entered: 02/04/2026 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Calvin Gary Walker for certificate of appealability [13]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [26-40010] (MVM) [Entered: 02/04/2026 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 11 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion to stay district court proceedings [ # 10 ] filed by Appellant Mr. Calvin Gary Walker [26-40010] (MVM) [Entered: 02/03/2026 12:49 PM] |
| Filing 10 Emergency MOTION to stay district court's ruling denying motion to stay state court proceedings pending appeal [10]. [26-40010] (MVM) [Entered: 02/03/2026 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:25-CV-358. Electronic ROA due on 02/13/2026. [26-40010] (MVM) [Entered: 01/29/2026 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 8 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 03/10/2026 for Appellant Calvin Gary Walker. Brief in Support due on 03/10/2026 for Appellant Calvin Gary Walker [26-40010] (MVM) [Entered: 01/29/2026 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 7 FEE PAID by Appellant Mr. Calvin Gary Walker. Fee deadline satisfied [26-40010] (MVM) [Entered: 01/29/2026 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Emergency Motion to Stay State Court's Judgment Revoking Community Supervision and Revoking Appeal Bond Pending Final Ruling From the Court of Appeals received from Appellant Mr. Calvin Gary Walker because this court does not have jurisdiction to issue a stay of state court proceedings; you must seek relief in the District Court. [26-40010] (MVM) [Entered: 01/29/2026 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 02/04/2026 for Appellant Calvin Gary Walker [26-40010] (JAK) [Entered: 01/19/2026 01:33 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Calvin Gary Walker [26-40010] (JAK) [Entered: 01/07/2026 02:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Walker v. State of Texas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Calvin Gary Walker | |
| Represented By: | Calvin Gary Walker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State of Texas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
