In re: Patrick Hurd
| In re: Patrick Hurd |
| 26-40058 |
| February 3, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 COURT ORDER denied as unnecessary Motion to file successive petition filed by Movant Mr. Patrick Hurd [ # 2 ]. [26-40058] (RAJ) [Entered: 02/27/2026 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 4 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [26-40058] (DLJ) [Entered: 02/03/2026 01:16 PM] |
| Filing 3 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis & copy of Certified Inmate Trust Fund Account Statement received from Movant Mr. Patrick Hurd, because a fee is not required. [26-40058] (DLJ) [Entered: 02/03/2026 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION filed by Movant Mr. Patrick Hurd for authorization to file successive 2254 petition [2]. Date received in 5th Circuit: 01/20/2026. Date of service: 01/13/2026. [26-40058] (DLJ) [Entered: 02/03/2026 12:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [26-40058] (DLJ) [Entered: 02/03/2026 12:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Patrick Hurd | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: Patrick Hurd | |
| Represented By: | Patrick Hurd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
