Buesing v. Knox
| Stephen A. Buesing |
| Captain Unknown Knox, Doctor Unknown Perkins, Jane or John Does, Transport Officers, Doctor Unknown Comeaux, Wardend Unknown Ragsdale, Unknown Henslee and Sergeant Unknown Layton |
| 26-40145 |
| March 19, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [20] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [26-40145] (SR) [Entered: 07/30/2026 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 16 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [26-40145] (SR) [Entered: 07/22/2026 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 13 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 6:25-CV-277. Electronic ROA due on 07/16/2026. [26-40145] (SR) [Entered: 07/01/2026 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 12 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Stephen A. Buesing in support of Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA [ # 11 ]. Date of Service: 06/18/2026. [12] [26-40145] (SR) [Entered: 07/01/2026 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Stephen A. Buesing to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). Financial affidavit filed as the motion. [11] Fee deadline canceled. Date of service: 06/18/2026 [26-40145] (SR) [Entered: 07/01/2026 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 10 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 06/26/2026 for Appellant Stephen A. Buesing [26-40145] (SR) [Entered: 06/17/2026 08:04 AM] |
| Filing 9 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the financial affidavit received from Appellant Mr. Stephen A. Buesing because financial affidavit must be accompanied by a standard motion for in forma pauperis and a brief in support. [26-40145] (SR) [Entered: 06/02/2026 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 7 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 04/28/2026 Fee assessment to the district court order denying IFP referencing BAUGH. Fee deadline updated to 06/11/2026 for Appellant Stephen A. Buesing. Fee due or motion for IFP in 5CCA. [26-40145] (SR) [Entered: 05/12/2026 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 8 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the financial affidavit received from Appellant Mr. Stephen A. Buesing because motion for in forma pauperis (IFP) is required with the financial affidavit. The financial affidavit is not the correct affidavit required for this court. Also, the motion for IFP must be accompnay with a brief in support of your motion for IFP. [26-40145] (SR) [Entered: 05/12/2026 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 6 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 04/20/2026 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Stephen A. Buesing because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessment required - BAUGH case. [26-40145] (SR) [Entered: 04/28/2026 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 5 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Stephen A. Buesing. Fee deadline satisfied. [26-40145] (SR) [Entered: 04/17/2026 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 4 LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Stephen A. Buesing Appellant notifying this court that his motion for IFP was filed in district court on 04/10/2026.. [26-40145] (SR) [Entered: 04/17/2026 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 3 FILING FEE IS REQUIRED. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 05/13/2026 for Appellant Stephen A. Buesing [26-40145] (MVM) [Entered: 03/19/2026 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Stephen A. Buesing [26-40145] (MVM) [Entered: 03/19/2026 09:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
