Shields v. Port Arthur ISD
| Robin Dennis Perry Shields, Individually, and as next friend of, John Doe 1 |
| Port Arthur Independent School District, Mark Porterie and Monique Bienvenue |
| 26-40187 |
| April 6, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/08/2026 for Appellant Robin Dennis Perry Shields. [26-40187] (DDL) [Entered: 04/27/2026 08:42 AM] |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [26-40187] (DDL) [Entered: 04/27/2026 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Brandon P. Monk for Appellant Robin Dennis Perry Shields in 26-40187. [26-40187] (RLL) [Entered: 04/22/2026 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Brandon P. Monk for Ms. Robin Dennis Perry Shields for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-40187] (Brandon P. Monk ) [Entered: 04/21/2026 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:24-CV-171. Electronic ROA due on 05/05/2026. [26-40187] (RA) [Entered: 04/20/2026 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [26-40187] (RA) [Entered: 04/20/2026 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Robin Dennis Perry Shields [26-40187] (RA) [Entered: 04/06/2026 04:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
