Scranton v. Ditech Financial
Plaintiff: Monique Scranton and Karey Scranton
Defendant: Ditech Financial, L.L.C. and Newrez, L.L.C., doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Case Number: 26-40241
Filed: April 28, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Property Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2026 Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Brandon P. Monk for Appellant Karey Scranton in 26-40241, Attorney Brandon P. Monk for Appellant Monique Scranton in 26-40241 [26-40241] (KJ) [Entered: 06/02/2026 04:32 PM]
May 27, 2026 Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Brandon P. Monk for Ms. Karey Scranton and Ms. Monique Scranton for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-40241] (Brandon P. Monk ) [Entered: 05/27/2026 03:54 PM]
May 22, 2026 Filing 11 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 07/01/2026 for Appellants Karey Scranton and Monique Scranton. [26-40241] (DDL) [Entered: 05/22/2026 09:20 AM]
May 22, 2026 Filing 10 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [26-40241] (DDL) [Entered: 05/22/2026 09:19 AM]
May 20, 2026 Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Graham Webster Gerhardt for Appellee Newrez, L.L.C. in 26-40241 [26-40241] (RA) [Entered: 05/20/2026 02:41 PM]
May 19, 2026 Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-40241] (Graham Webster Gerhardt ) [Entered: 05/19/2026 09:20 AM]
May 18, 2026 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:24-CV-482. Electronic ROA due on 06/02/2026. [26-40241] (RA) [Entered: 05/18/2026 01:50 PM]
May 18, 2026 Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [26-40241] (RA) [Entered: 05/18/2026 01:46 PM]
April 28, 2026 Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Ms. Karey Scranton and Ms. Monique Scranton [26-40241] (RAJ) [Entered: 04/28/2026 03:50 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Scranton v. Ditech Financial
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Monique Scranton
Represented By: Brandon P. Monk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karey Scranton
Represented By: Brandon P. Monk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ditech Financial, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Newrez, L.L.C., doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Represented By: Jessie Ruth Manzewitsch Pulero
Represented By: Graham Webster Gerhardt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?