Chimney v. Unknown Patterson
| Alvin O. Chimney, Jr. |
| Unknown Patterson, Officer, Tyler Police Department and Unknown Dahl, Officer, Tyler Police Department |
| 26-40395 |
| June 29, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 09/28/2026 for Appellant Alvin O. Chimney Jr.. [26-40395] (MVM) [Entered: 08/17/2026 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [26-40395] (MVM) [Entered: 08/17/2026 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Michael Keith Dollahite for Appellee Unknown Dahl in 26-40395, Attorney Michael Keith Dollahite for Appellee Unknown Patterson in 26-40395 [26-40395] (SR) [Entered: 07/27/2026 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Michael Keith Dollahite for Mr. Unknown Dahl and Mr. Unknown Patterson for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-40395] (Michael Keith Dollahite ) [Entered: 07/27/2026 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 6:25-CV-53. Electronic ROA due on 08/10/2026. [26-40395] (SR) [Entered: 07/24/2026 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [26-40395] (SR) [Entered: 07/24/2026 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Alvin O. Chimney, Jr. [26-40395] (RA) [Entered: 06/29/2026 05:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.